Bill Clinton shook a lot of hands with them while they attacked 4 of our intrest (1st WTC bombing, USS Cole, 2 Embassies in Africa)
Bush didn't make a lot of friends didn't shake a lot of hands, but he did say enough is enough.
You don't continue to pet a dog while it is bitting you.
2007-10-07 14:15:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
A non-interventionist foreign places coverage could be ultimate (like what Ron Paul proposes). I cant think of Hillary - or absolutely everyone, relatively - doing a worse job than Bush on foreign places coverage. i admire the belief of going after Bin weighted down, and making the attempt to 'take out' the terrorists, yet Bush has no longer positioned it into prepare. no longer that this is incredibly his fault - its almost impossible to combat an enemy that runs, hides, and has no longer something to lose. Terrorists, insurgents, guerillas, etc, have not got a suited military which will nicely be defeated conventionally, this is why you are able to by no potential thoroughly beat them. for this reason we lost Vietnam. there is not any foriegn coverage that could get rid of terrorism or terrorists. Therefor the final factor to do isn't create them interior the 1st place by wreckless foreign places coverage.
2016-10-10 12:17:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by hagensee 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Under Mr. Clinton we had an attitude of we are sorry that you attacked us and how much money will it take to make you feel better? Oh and there were many that were under Mr. Clinton,,,,,,,,if you know what I mean!
Under Mr. Bush we have been attacked once and we fought back. Maybe not in the way that I would have liked but we have not been attacked over and over like we were under Mr. Clinton.
2007-10-07 16:59:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by fatboysdaddy 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Clinton did nothing of any substance in either case.
Bush has at least had the courage to act.
2007-10-07 14:07:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
while slick Willie was nailing interns Madelene Albrecht was getting drunk and possible nailed by North Korea tyrant KIM IL JUNG and after they promised to respect each other he went ahead and built his nukes anyway.
GW isn't messing around with the hired help and wouldn't waste time letting that sick little midget lie to us any more.
2007-10-07 14:58:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by CFB 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
ill be very interested in reading these answers to see if anyone can come up with any differences.
2007-10-07 14:14:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Are you trying to get someone to do your homework ?
2007-10-07 14:41:14
·
answer #7
·
answered by Doc Hutch 1
·
1⤊
0⤋