Mc·Car·thy·ism (m-kärth-zm) KEY
NOUN:
1.The practice of publicizing accusations of political disloyalty or subversion with insufficient regard to evidence.
2.The use of unfair investigatory or accusatory methods in order to suppress opposition.
No.
2007-10-07 12:12:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mark 3
·
1⤊
3⤋
I'm not sure, I just learned that as a Republican I hate the planet, want kids to die for lack of health care and have some inexplicable desire to kill blacks and gays. Man, according to the news I must have joined the "evil club". I never knew I felt that way until the democrats told me I do. Oh and it seems I am also ultrachristian. I hadn't known that either. When did I decide to force women to have kids they don't want? I'm not sure but according to the left I'm radically pro-life too.
Tell me again how McCarthyism works?
2007-10-09 02:12:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by joshbl74 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Joe McCarthy was a great man who exposed Communists in our government. He was and is still slandered by Liberal lemmings like yourself. You have NO idea what "McCarthyism" is. All you and lemming friends know is what the PRO-COMMUNIST media told you about him. There is no and never was McCarthyism. But there is Liberalism that hates America and will destroy anyone who stands up for It.
2007-10-07 12:17:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by Lucius Vorenus 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Was McCarthy wrong? During that time, there were many communists in the country. Hollywood was loaded with commies. Today, we have left-wing wackos infesting the DUMBOCRAPIC PARTY.
2007-10-07 13:43:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by george s 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Of course.
"If you're not with us, you're against us."
Isn't that the Republican motto?
(Here comes another fear alert! Just in time for the 'o8 elections! Remember what Bush and Cheney said if the Democrats were to take over Congress? "If Democrats win, the terrorists will come and attack." It's been a year since--and no terrorist attack. But plenty of fake plots by the government since last November. That's for sure.)
2007-10-07 12:14:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
An example of what you mean would be nice.
If you refer to telling the truth about liberal agendas in this country, I am not sure how it is underhanded. McCarthyism in my book was a good thing.
2007-10-07 12:09:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by The Patrioteer 4
·
2⤊
3⤋
How is McCarthyism underhanded? jk, no, i don't believe they are because they are for the most part being as veracious as possible( mainly for fear of criticism if they were to spin the truth)
2007-10-07 12:08:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by Professor Sheed 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
damn,I hope so! put their lib feet to the fire! what have you got running? a socialist/commie female, a muslim inexperienced empty suit! that's the best you can do.the rest are not even worth mentioning....whoops,i forgot the nut case midget, dennis the menace!
2007-10-07 13:29:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
The question may be easier to answer if you gave some examples of what you are talking about? Since I haven't seen anything of that nature, I will say no.
2007-10-07 12:09:08
·
answer #9
·
answered by Truth is elusive 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
What the heck are you talking about? I just don't see any way that your question makes sense. In the words of Inego Montoyez, "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."
2007-10-07 12:12:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by James L 7
·
0⤊
2⤋