leading candidate for the Nobel Peace Prize. President Bush is just holding on until he can retire from office and spend the rest of his days sitting on his front porch spitting sun flower seeds.
2007-10-07
12:00:08
·
17 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
But Bush was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize by Rush Limbaugh and Karl Rove.
2007-10-07
12:11:26 ·
update #1
In the arena of world opinion, Bush is thought of as a provincial boob, while Gore is highly respected. Bush is not as dumb as he looks. Crawford, Texas is miles and miles away from the nearest ocean. He will be high and dry as the oceans start to rise.
2007-10-07
12:15:11 ·
update #2
Of course Gore has had a better 3 years.
Bush and his supporters are increasingly left with a thinner and thinner thread of spin to allow them to think that the US is making any kind of progress in Iraq, and not a week goes by that some event indicating global warming is true is found in the news - ice caps shrinking, wildlife migrating, spring coming earlier and fall lasting longer...
BBbbbbut there was a mistake in the math!!! they say as the indications that Gore was right go by in front of their eyes.
2007-10-07 12:23:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by oohhbother 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
You must have heard incorrectly. Limbaugh doesn't have a vote in the Nobel Peace Prize. Limbaugh does however, have significant influence in the Doughball Pizza Prize. He has numerous nominations including:
1. Himself in the category of "Body Composition Most Similar to Uncooked Pizza Dough";
2. President Bush in the category of "Responsible for the Most Pizza Deliveries to a Middle Eastern Muslim Country"; and
3. Vice President Dick Cheney in the category of "Personality Most Like Overcooked Pizza Crust".
The awards will be presented on your local public access TV station in November.
2007-10-07 14:28:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
You do realize that Bush was once nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize as well.
2007-10-07 12:07:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
First you may comprehend the way the president is elected previously you are able to decide who won. next you may comprehend that the FL element replaced into purely a great waste of tax payers funds. The decide ruling replaced right into a great waste of tax payers funds because of the fact the two subject concerns had not something to do with how the president is elected. i actually wish people might make an effort to comprehend that the founding leaders of our usa did not prefer retards balloting the president into workplace so as that they created the favored vote. the favored vote is only that a nicely-liked vote and does not something to choose the president. so some distance as who won nicely that man or woman is in workplace. Did the folk placed him in workplace, nope. can we each and every be waiting to place a president in workplace, if the guidelines exchange on how he/she is elected then according to threat and that i rigidity the according to threat. the only authentic way for the folk to place a president in workplace is to regulate the governors place. replace,,,,5-5-08 i actually unwell of listening to people say stolen, robs extreme jacked. people, decide and the folk have not something TO DO WITH ELECTING THE PRESIDENT, WHAT area of THIS DO YOU not comprehend! I advise somewhat is it that confusing for the folk of this usa to comprehend the way the president is elected. You all think of your vote counts, what form of worldwide might this be if your vote counted. they are only attempting to make you think of it counts!
2016-10-06 06:48:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Al Gores documentary was proven wrong in August. The entire documentary was based on incorrect data. A Canadian scientist noticed the error and alerted NASA to the mistake. NASA has since released temperature corrections for the 1900's.
2007-10-07 12:03:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by a bush family member 7
·
5⤊
2⤋
Just shows how low the nobel prize has fallen. First it goes to Arafat.. and then maybe to Gore for his mucumentary nonsense? At this rate Bin Laden will be winning it next year.
2007-10-07 12:03:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
2⤋
Al Gore's documentary was a farce and proved scientifically flawed.....
Oscars are handed out by Hollywood, people who have never had a grasp on reality.
Nobel prizes are bought, any idiot knows this.....
Your short sighted idea of what the current president has done or will do belies your liberalism.
Let's ask this, who has gotten fatter?????
2007-10-07 12:10:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Gore is the modern day chicken little So the right answer is Bush
2007-10-07 12:13:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Documentary. That is creative. Propoganda for a Socialist agenda is more accurate. Kyoto is nothing more than redistribution of wealth and a way to cripple the US economy even more.
In fact is absurd to think that man is responsible for global warming. I guess we are heating things up on Mars too, eh?
2007-10-07 12:08:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by The Patrioteer 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
You said it -
Al won an Oscar for his documentary in lieu of any sort of scientific award because it was a work of FICTION !!!!!!
Bush has done very well, has made a lot of strides in ensuring our futures and taken into account what is REALLY important to our children's future -
security, sovereignty and freedom.
2007-10-07 12:11:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by wider scope 7
·
0⤊
2⤋