I really wish we could have people like him and FDR right now.
2007-10-07 11:34:10 · 21 answers · asked by hanzieb2001 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes he is, he was a great leader and heaven knows where we would be if he hadn`t taken over from Chamberlain who tried and failed to appease Hitler!
Anyone who thinks he isn`t is in need of a history lesson!
2007-10-07 11:45:31 · answer #1 · answered by Sir Bobby`s Hairdresser 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
None of you people have a clue as to what a scumbag Churchill really was. That's because you don't get the facts from Hollywood. It is true that the Kaiser did try to avoid war, look it up dindongs. It's also true that this "wonderful" ally Churchill was glad to suck the USA into both World War I and II when the Brits were getting their butts whipped. He was pleased when US ships were being sunk, just happy to get the USA to bail his sorry butt out. It was Churchill who said "Americans will always do what's right once they've tried everything else" Sound like he liked Americans? You're kidding yourselves. Hitler was despicable; Churchill wasn't much better.
2016-04-07 09:52:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes he is considered a hero. But only because he was the leader through a war, and most importantly was there when we won the war, anyone like that is going to be considered a hero. So unless we have another world war we won't have any such people again
2007-10-07 11:38:22 · answer #3 · answered by Stephen M 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
FDR whats that , theres lots of rumours about Churchill bet i think it goes for any goverment they dont care about us , just lining there pockets with money
2007-10-07 11:39:34 · answer #4 · answered by starcp76 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who changed the definition of "Hero"??
"Heroes" are a dime a dozen these days.
Everyone in a uniform to start with ??
People like Wesley Autrey are real heroes
2007-10-07 11:40:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, but the Brits are taking him and the rest of what happened during WWII out of their teaching curriculum! How are the future generations suppose to prevent future atrocities like the Nazi's, if they never learn about them.
Also, I wouldn't want someone like FDR again. He was a communist sympathizing socialist. He and LBJ are the precursors to todays level of socialism in this country! Look it up, he's only thought of as a great president because of WWII.
2007-10-07 11:41:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
disagree. good pm during the war but voted out of power at 1st election after war, people were fed up off him and wanted change. you had FDR you also had CLINTON?
2007-10-07 11:39:24 · answer #7 · answered by fatman5xl 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
leaders arent what get people thru wars,the people are,he was a good figure head for the time but not a hero to me.
2007-10-07 14:40:28 · answer #8 · answered by razawire 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
personally no, Churchill was a great British war leader but apart from that that he was a git. he was largely responsible for the galipoli disatser, he had striking miners shot and Wales and did not represent the majority of people at the time.
2007-10-07 22:04:44 · answer #9 · answered by supremecritic 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Winston was voted Best Briton of all time, most people here respect him and what he did
2007-10-07 14:06:27 · answer #10 · answered by angela m 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋