The best....UM...NO. When his numbers surpass Jerry Rice, I will think about it, but still give the nod to Jerry as he has class. Don't get me wrong, I think TO is great and probably will be worthy of the HOF, but not the best.
Look at TO like Barry Bonds...no I'm not saying TO is a steroid case. What I am saying is that his play is great and the person is not.
2007-10-07 11:07:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by TC 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No.
Terrell Owens may be among the top three receivers in the NFL right now (and for the past 5 or more years), but he is definitely not worthy of a Hall of Fame induction.
He does have good numbers, but he doesn't have a Super Bowl, and the one time he was there he could thank his team, for he was injured in the playoff run.
Arguably the greatest reason for why he won't be a Hall of Famer is that horrendous attitude he brings to the clubhouse. He helped lead the Eagles to the Superbowl in 2004, but he was gone a year later. They dropped him because he brought them down, and I think that if you are a hall of fame player, you have to be an asset to the team on and off the field.
2007-10-07 17:56:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by Bill D 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
He deserves to go to the hall of fame, he's an outstanding player and has made his mark in the NFL. Ignore those people who say no because he has bad character. That's bull. T.O. is a great person and should be respected. T.O. will go to the hall of fame.
2007-10-07 17:48:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
T.O. is definatley Hall of Fame worthy. He has the stats needed to get in and he also has been one of the top receivers in the NFL for most of his career. T.O. will get in the Hall of Fame one day.
2007-10-07 19:22:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Terrell is more worthy of going to the Hall of Asses!
Put Ark Monk in the Hall, then you can put the horses *** in the hall after 20 years from retiring.
Oh, and how do you know that Terrell is a "great" person? People throw the word "great" too easily.
2007-10-07 17:52:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by sebastian 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
yes he does (it pains me to say that as an eagles fan). he has great numbers! he can move into top 5 in alot of major catigoires by the time hes done...unlike MLB, the NFL has a clause in HOF voting saying that you cant use a players' character when concidering him for induction (thats why OJ Simpson cant be kicked out of the HOF and thats why Pete Rose is never going to make it there). therefore, no one can use the fact that he is a terrable teammate and he distroyed 2 teams against him. so, based on pure preformance, he is almost a shoe-in
2007-10-07 17:54:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by Chris S 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I hate his guts. And although no one would realistically say he's the best, he does have Hall of Fame numbers. He will be in the Hall.
2007-10-07 17:48:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
he is not the best but he is damn good and he is worthy of going to the hall of fame.
2007-10-07 17:47:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by --Sinister™ 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
his skills are great but he gets alot of minus points because everybody hates his stupid mouth. The guys 34 years old and acts like he just scored his first TD
2007-10-07 17:48:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not yet but a few more productive years with Tony Romo could give him a shot
2007-10-07 18:07:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋