They support Saddam's rise to power and arm Iran. Then they declare them a terrorist threat.
They falsified info to invade Iraq. This empowered Iran and Al-Q. Now they want to invade Iran after empowering them.
They write laws benefiting US companies to move to China. They explode the trade deficit with China to benefit the corporations. Then they cry that China is a threat.
2007-10-07 08:13:05 · 12 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
who cares (below) I am both a conservative and a liberal. I do not fit into any one box. I am an Independent.
2007-10-07 08:22:41 · update #1
I don't want to, I like it.
2007-10-07 08:24:21 · answer #1 · answered by ? 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
1. Whether you like it or not, Saddam was a brutal dictator, and Ahmadinejad IS an insane, vicious dictator with a theocractic agenda who cannot be trusted with nuclear weapons.
2. They did NOT falsify info to invade Iraq. Watch this vid to hear some DEMOCRAT statements on Iraq, several made as of 1998:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNgaVtVaiJE
3. Clinton was the architect of NAFTA and other such treaties which benifit corperations that move over seas. Other factors, such as greedy unions are also contributers to this problem.
4. There is no way at this point to break the WORLD's circle of violence... Not until everyone agrees to play by the same rules. The U.N.'s massive failures should be evidence enough of that.
2007-10-07 15:24:23 · answer #2 · answered by Firestorm 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Personally, I think the French had it right: Public executions, blood in the streets and La Guilloutine. I think you'll find a lot of really marginal political behaviour coming to an end when loss of your head is the penalty, no right of appeal, and no dragging it out in the courts for decades. One quick flick of the blade and you're done. Like it says in the Bible: "There is a time and a season for every purpose under heaven..." When the government of the formerly most powerful, freest nation on Earth becomes peopled and run by NOTHING but lying, thieving, non-accountable, non-transparent, immoral (ie "without morality", not just low in it...but having NONE), self-serving, mass murdering, nationalistic, overbearing terrorists who are currently running a 9.865 TRILLION dollar debt, then believe me, the time has come for some blood in the streets. Hang 'em all, I say. Kill 'em all and hang 'em high. And I'm a former espouser of non-violence. I hold the work of MLK and Gandhi in incredibly high esteem. I just think it's too late for non-violence to work in this situation. Your government has been taken over. Your Constitution has been co-opted and rewritten, without your consent or knowledge, your world is currently being sold to the highest bidder and DESTROYED, and YOU'RE ALL STILL WATCHING YOUR F*CKING FURNITURE, waiting for it to tell you the truth. George Orwell was telling the damn truth, and he was a visionary: "Endless bloody war...unending torture, horror and pain..."
2007-10-07 15:38:55 · answer #3 · answered by calyx156 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
By exterminating all of those who want to kill Americans.
Sure there was bad intel. but remember that SOB Husein was in violation of United nations resolutions for about ten years.
That alone justifies Invasion. The only problem is that we worried too much about collateral damage.
We should have struck hard then gotten out immediately.
We always have the option of going back in and kicking their ant pile.
2007-10-07 15:30:05 · answer #4 · answered by ? 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'm with you on this one. We have seen a march toward globalization for many terms now and with it the continued decline of Americas status and prosperity.
I think we should vote Hunter. He is for border security so he is not among those seeking globalization.
2007-10-07 15:34:07 · answer #5 · answered by Locutus1of1 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
simple, ignore al qaeda as clinton did, then in a few years you wont have anything to worry about,as youll be living in a conquered country
you liberals have no shame, none whatsoever.
2007-10-07 15:32:55 · answer #6 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
How can we end the Clinton/Clinton mafia family circle of violence?
People opposed B. Clinton and people ended up dead. People ended up dead that were to come clean on some Clinton trash. Please end this circle of violence.
2007-10-07 15:26:43 · answer #7 · answered by Huevos Rancheros 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
just elect a president with no violence in the next election.
2007-10-08 11:02:09 · answer #8 · answered by jjbctvzm 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Are you a Conservative? Those men are supposed to be your buddies.
2007-10-07 15:17:37 · answer #9 · answered by Liberal City 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
simple vote Democratic
2007-10-07 15:23:26 · answer #10 · answered by EviL 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋