Europeans are capable of handling this crisis. How will this pattern of almost "mandatory" U.S. involvement in Europe affect US budgetary restraints? Who pays the bill ?
2007-10-07 04:41:04 · 5 answers · asked by vivet 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Crabby, if there weren't any genocide there, would that crack your constellation of motives?
That "Clinton" story kinda distracts us from the petroleum pumped brains that want to eat the Russians alive.
Clinton's affairs and Bush this Bush that, are just the tip of an iceberg of the real danger. They serve to the naive masses as emotional scapegoats, hiding the real monsters of this planet.
2007-10-07 07:07:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 0⤋
That was to distract the country from Clinton's troubles. We have no interest in Kosovo.
If we did we would have sent lots of ground troops rather than just expend air strike ordinance.
2007-10-07 12:21:32 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
wasn't that to distract the country from the lewinsky hearings?? you never heard a word about that while Clinton had international stuff to shine in front of our eyes.
2007-10-07 11:44:55 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 1⤋
Check your facts. The US was involved in Kosovo because we are a member of NATO, which is comprised of several European nations. NATO made the decision to intervene in Kosovo to put an end to the ethnic cleansing, as part of that decision, a multi-national NATO force was dispatched to restore order. Military forces from all NATO member countries participated in that operation.
2007-10-07 12:37:33 · answer #4 · answered by pas211n 3 · 0⤊ 8⤋
Because wwe are part of NATO--and stabilizing that region in the wake of the collapse of the Soviet Union was vital to our interests.
Also to stop the "Christians" in the region from continuing their "ethnic cleansing" (genocide) of Muslims.
2007-10-07 11:52:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 8⤋