Who do you prefer: Limbaugh, Scarborough, Hannity, Levin, O'Reilly, Savage, Drudge, Ingraham, or Medved?

Question

Like:
1. Limbaugh. He is not only a sincere conservative, but he is articulate, thorough, polite to his callers, and intellectually stimulating. I agree with MOST of what he says, and I always respect what he has to say.
2. Scarborough: He gives me the factual "fuel" I need to carry on a discussion or debate about political matters with liberals and conservatives alike. Some conservatives think he's a hack who has switched bases; I think he speaks his heart and still believes in the fundamentals of social and economic conservatism.

Okay:
1. Hannity: I used to like him, but anymore, he just repeats the same defense of Mitt or Rudy or the same arguments against Hillary or Obama 3,000,000 times a show. This stuff IS important, I'll grant, but try highlighting some of the positives in the current conservative movement. His interview style can be rude.

Don't like:
1. Savage. He's a jerk.
2. Ingraham: That Connecticut accent of hers almost nauseates this Southerner.

Answer 1

I personally like O'Rilley, his show is pretty good.

Answer 2

Limbaugh. He understands how the world works. He is entertaining and gets under the skin of liberals.

Levin. I have been listening to him on 770 ABC for a long time.

I do not like Hannity's style. Scarborough is a sissy. O'Reilly is ok. Savage is a negative nancy. Do not listen to Drudge or Medved. Ingraham is ok.

You excluded Glenn Beck.

Answer 3

I like them all and thank God we have the talk show forum for the conservative view, because the television news and printed media are so biased it is un-believable! That is with the exception of Fox News which is Fair and Balanced, which the rest of the media perceives as RIGHT WINGED! LOL

Anyway, I don't think that Rudy or Mitt have a chance in 08 so I hope that Fred Thompson gets it in gear and finds a strong running mate! Because if Hilary and Obama team up, we are going to have an up hill fight!

The GOP will not support a pro-choice, married 3 times Catholic with a lisp, sorry Rudy. We will also discard, the smooth looking Mormon who has flipped on numerous issues and is from an extremely liberal state.

Get behind FRED!

RED STATES come out in 08!!!!

Answer 4

Frankly, I used to take heed to all of those (different than Levin...he's not on the place I lived). yet over the Bush years, i've got misplaced interest in maximum of them as they grew to grow to be shills for the present administration, particularly than voices for actual conservative values. My well-liked on the instant is Tucker Carlson, and that i nonetheless like Scarborough. Drudge earned sufficient comprehend in the previous days that I nonetheless provide him credibility. And Limbaugh has continually been relaxing, yet I infrequently enable him effect my opinion anymore...he's shown to be too supportive of Republican shenanigans. Hannity and O'Reilly are completely valueless, and that i doubt if i will ever pay attention to the two one lower back. Savage is in basic terms obnoxious, and that i don't pay attention to him anymore the two, yet a minimum of he's not yet another carbon replica, precise?

Answer 5

1. Limbaugh. He is not only a sincere conservative, but he is articulate, thorough, polite to his callers, and intellectually stimulating. I agree with MOST of what he says, and I always respect what he has to say

Yeah like making fun of people with Parkinson's disease, he's an uneducated jerk and you and the country know it!

Answer 6

I do think Rush, by far, elevates the discussion and challenges me to think. I totally agree with you on Hannity and I get a little weary of his talking points . . .small doses if anything! The big difference between he and Rush is that Rush asks probing question, lets people speak, and unltimately they bury themselves . . . a very effective technique. Hannity on the other hand tries to bury people with a question, usually a long "talking point" question. . . a technique I find to be silly at best!

Answer 7

stephanie miller.

someday we'll all find out why ann coulter has repeatedly refused to debate eddie schultz.

still, stephanie miller gets my vote - funniest radio show since the corporate jerks took stern off the air.

imagine - insane, drug addled rush limbaugh instead of howard stern...

Answer 8

Rush is just awesome for the reasons you pointed out... Scarby has yet to make a viable impression on me, and Hannity, while I like his conservative nature, does repeat his points as you said, and Glenn Beck is the most informative in my opinion... One personality I can't stand is Mark Levin... His voice is almost as annoying as Hillary's cackle...

Answer 9

Medved because he puts on people who disagree with his point of view and has a very clam debate and 99% of the time he shows how shrill the left can be and doesn't have to say anything.

Answer 10

Clearly this question is not for me, I would have to say none of the above. Rush sounds smart but sooner or later you can trace his seemingly logical reasoning back to a statement of unsupported fact. When you start from an unsupported assumption folks you are proving nothing but trying to sound cool.

Answer 11

I like Rush, Savage, and Ingraham.
I also like Levin and Medved.
The guy you didn't mention that I really like is Phil Valentine. He has interesting topics and great listeners that call in for more fuel. Listen to him sometime.
Sometimes I like O'Reilly depending on his topic.
I usually don't listen to Hannity because I tire of his repetition and support of Mitt and Rudy. I will make my own decisiion. I also don't like his constant promotion of country music. He gets boring really fast anymore.