English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

23 answers

Well, both are the same, they will work for the same peoples behind them! Its sad that we could not find a way to control the purveyors of those candidates, so to have a REAL look at who they really are! Both are CFR members and will lead the US into the same black hole as Bush, so not sure its relevant to talk about those two, while in fact they are both from the same ground and ideology, but differ only in look!
I guess its because our world is so sensitive to the look rather than the content of peoples. I just wish that peoples will understand that fuelling a debate around those two, is doing a great diservice to the American peoples as it distract them from the real difference, which means any candidate not corrupt by the ideas and affiliations of the CFR, and other banking institutions!

2007-10-07 09:06:45 · answer #1 · answered by Jedi squirrels 5 · 1 0

If you mean Obama by Blackman, there is no denying the fact that he is intelligent, articulate and seems sincere; but what he lacks is the most important of all. Experience and discretion. What to say when and how. Just pleasing immature audiences is not enough for statecraft. Discretion, patience and perseverance are required in good measure.

Once he said he will send his army into Pakistan in hot pursuit of terrorists. Pakistan was and still continues to be a close ally of US. Musharraf is already in deep trouble and his survival is at stake with his own country's hotheads. Obama is not the President and hence does not know he can't be talking about an ally and create all sorts of troubles.

After some time he comes with the suggestion that he will go and talk face to face with adversaries like Iran etc. No doubt talking with enemies and resolving the differencesby diplomatic means is good , but has he done his home work fully on the matter and come up to give the back up measures to assure his voters the outlines as to how he will accomplish it.

Now he comes up with his decision to stop wearing the national flag pin on his lapel , to shun tokenism in true patriotism. These are well established and evolved conventions and it does not behove a potential candidate shoots his mouth randomly. He requires patience, perseverance and discretion to prove himself after he is elected President. America shall surely be missing a potential Black President in Obama.

2007-10-07 02:21:15 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Is this a theoretical? Because I don't think either Clinton or Obama are really qualified for the job, although Clinton does get the edge.

I am waiting for a minority candidate or a woman candidate with real credentials before they get my vote.

"Oh, but your just a conservative white man. You would NEVER vote for a woman, or a black." I know, that's what some of you are saying.

Well, let me list of two people that conservatives can back 100%.

Lady Margeret Thatcher
Goldia Meir

So much for the argument that #1, a woman cannot govern, and #2, a woman leader cannot be conservative.

2007-10-07 01:55:53 · answer #3 · answered by Jam_Til_Impact 5 · 3 0

Right now, I feel that Hillary has alot of experience in Politics whereas Obama is a close second. I could go either way this next election. Hillary and Bill would make a powerful Government (for the people) not the politician. Obama has a great sense of vision and I think he would be a great leader and pull this country together. The down side is that the Republicans probably have his demise already in place should he win. I'm afraid Obama will rest next to Kennedy if elected.

2007-10-07 01:57:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

O, i'm hoping Mitt Romney wins, with the aid of fact we want a businessman to help this united states of america ravaged via undesirable economic gadget judgements and debt. I additionally like the reality that he by no potential spends his time undesirable-mouthing his fighters. actual gentleman. i do no longer want some gossip-loving, vast mouth, stable for no longer something president. Obama is a funky guy, yet all I ever hear from him is speaking undesirable issues approximately Hillary. Hillary, on the different factor, by no potential solutions the question interior the straight away way, and various circumstances alterations her place on various perspectives. i'm additionally ill of trees and Clinton's. can we've somebody else interior the white abode? Mitt Romney is the way. and that i evaluate myself a democrat! bypass discern.

2016-10-10 11:27:03 · answer #5 · answered by gregersen 4 · 0 0

How is he better qualified? He hasn't been in the Senate as long as Hillary. He has only been in the Senate since 2006. Before that he was a state senator in Illinois. What has he done that makes him more qualified than all the other candidates? I don't think you have any idea what you are talking about.

2007-10-07 01:48:00 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

You're question gives more reason as to why Condi Rice should run. If we don't elect Hillary, we're sexist, if we don't elect Barak, we're racist..Condi is the only safe candidate for president..Let's start to Draft Condi

Also, Obama is no were near as qualified as hillary..He's had what, 1-2 terms in the senate...He wasn't even around for the first war vote.

2007-10-07 02:40:28 · answer #7 · answered by crknapp79 5 · 0 3

I'd like to hope that the most qualified person will win, period. Doesn't matter if they are male/ female, white, black or green. I think the elections have become a popularity contest. I prefer resumes, please. Show me what you have accomplished and I might be impressed!

2007-10-07 01:52:50 · answer #8 · answered by Sniggle 6 · 4 0

We will elect a woman, someday - just not Hillary!

We will have a black president, but not Obama!

Neither are good candidates since they are socialist, pro-amnesty, raising taxes people. Neither has the proper experience. (Following Bill around isn't experience.)

2007-10-07 04:09:28 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

For some reason people think being a glorified housewife to a president is "experience". By that logic we'll be seeing Laura Bush as the front runner in 2012.

2007-10-07 02:57:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers