English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Everytime someone posts a question on here asking about why the Mc Canns are or are not doing this that and the other. They are attacked for not having a life, being obsessed, and then the real abuse starts. Do you think certain people on here are asking questions that are too close for comfort for Team Mc Cann?

2007-10-07 01:32:31 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Current Events

Susan L, your answer proves my point, thank you.

2007-10-08 12:40:49 · update #1

24 answers

Since this is still an unsolved case, the McCanns need to be kept under close watch.

2007-10-07 01:38:45 · answer #1 · answered by Tony R 5 · 14 5

As far as I can make out, the British press have done nothing but kissed the backsides of the McCanns. There has been non of the usual investigative reporting as with other cases. It appears to me that the whole press sindicate are treading very carefully here, and I wonder why, it isn't usual or normal and with every other missing child case, the newspapers have left "no stone unturned". Look at the way they treated Ben Needhams mother and family, why aren't they digging deeper with the McCanns?

2016-05-18 00:05:27 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

imagine if you were the missing child and people got bored asking where are you; to some people , this is outrage that children could be left alone and one goes missing and we are all walking around like this is never never land; this sets a precedent for others who then see that eventually the heat dies down and people resume their lives and an innocent child is gone , vanished , life extinguished for all we know; as a society this should be unacceptable and everything should be done until answers, clues, evidence is found; a child went missing through the actions or in actions of parents; I am not convinced that everything has been done by all those involved to find the child and protect the ones that they still have; they have demonstrated the worse judgment on the surface already; why do we think that 2 children are safe with them b/c the parents answered a few questions.

2007-10-07 02:41:13 · answer #3 · answered by sml 6 · 4 3

Nah, I think people really believe your obsession is disgusting, illogical, foundation less, unhealthy (mentally) and you really need to get jobs, stop sponging, develop some self respect. We are well aware that you do not have access to any evidence, witnesses, the McCanns, forensics, or anything except the same tabloid fodder as everyone else, which is written by a journalist with their own OPINIONS and bias, so everything you say is just fanciful musings from bitter people. Overall you come across as narrow minded, foolish and quite illogical. That's my take.
P.S. It is my belief that you are attempting to deflect attention away from your own inadequacies by trying to point out others. A bit like a fat, ugly bird pointing out a sexy girll has a hair out of place, for want of a better analogy.

2007-10-07 02:36:20 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 8 3

That was a very interesting post by Jack H, I'd be interested to find out more!

2007-10-07 21:24:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Jack H,
those are interesting points you make. I suppose you can back them up with evidence?
of course, judging by the amount of evil speculation, pointless anti-mccann questions and libelous comments on this site, it doesnt seem to be working here.
it is really stupid to belive that anyone who disagrees with your point of view must be paid by the mccanns

2007-10-07 05:10:03 · answer #6 · answered by SeabourneFerriesLtd 7 · 1 3

I think people are getting tired of the same questions being asked over and over again. How can anything be too close for comfort when all we know is what the papers are telling us. Why are you labelled Team or pro McCann if you agree with innocent until proven guilty and reserve total judgement until all the facts are in and presented.

2007-10-07 01:40:57 · answer #7 · answered by helen m 3 · 8 8

I would hardly call speculation, hatred, lies, distorted views and nasty innuendo............ close for comfort. Would you?

If you call answering questions will a more accurate description of events and putting them straight when they have got it wrong............. attacking. Then you are a very strange human being.

Well said.............. Firefoxy

2007-10-07 02:59:29 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 6 5

Is anyone here really arrogant and pompous enough to think that the rants here are worth anything? This case is being discussed everywhere.

2007-10-07 02:10:09 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 9 6

Gerry and Kate, a.k.a. "The Terrible Two" and their coterie of hangers on and leeches must now be in an absolute panic. The Terrible Two can see the end of their freedom on the horizon, justice is slowly catching up with them. Their gang are dismayed that their easy living and sponging from the Find Madeleine Fund will end once justice is done.

2007-10-07 01:50:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 10 8

fedest.com, questions and answers