Does anyone doubt that the Clinton Machine is behind the Rush controversy?

Question

and someone thinks Media matters is not run by the Clinton Machine?

Answer 1

No, I never doubted it. They sorely needed a fall man, especially since the heat started to build on her for being so tight-lipped about her association with moveon.org's financier George Soros. Things like this start to happen when people start to dig dirt on the Clinton's.

Another example: The not-gay Senator Craig's bathroom escapade breaks three MONTHS after the incident, during the very week Clinton got caught with illegal campaign funds again via their Chinese connections - Hsu. People were so wrapped up in what the party of morals were doing in bathrooms across the country, that they didn't even bother to indict her. Every time a story breaks about the GOP, the Clintons should be investigated because they're covering something else up.

Answer 2

That whole machine. You know it is bizaar that they have to try this kind of goofy stuff. Smoke and mirrors. Funny thing is they take it serious. What they say means nothing or they get away with it. They should ignore it as anyone would know it was bull s***. Al such a waste when we could be doing something construtive, don't want to do that. Pay back is hel1 and what goes around comes around.

Still it's bizaar and when I start to heard it I remember Ihave to rearrange my sock drawer.

People are weird. Surfing and catch a minute of Bill Marhr (msp) and the guy remarked about U. S. troops bashing in babies heads. What kin of mind is that?

Answer 3

Of course it is. The Clintons are behind Media Matters and George Soros is behind the Clintons.

Answer 4

no doubt at all
you have to love the liberal response to this question though
talk about ignorant
at least the swift boat vets served along side Kerry so their accusations where from first hand knowledge of the man and his actions. I doubt any one from moveon.dork ever served with General Petraeus at all

Answer 5

Mega Dittos to Billary Clintax being behind both.

FYI, Toko...I ain't learnt nuttin', but in the course of my life I have learned enough to know that a vote for a liberal is a vote for socialism.

Answer 6

There isnt a controversy. I think its more aptly called the Media Matters controversy.

Answer 7

Innocent until proved guilty. Your question assumes a lot, but the question of whether or not it is true is reasonable to ask. I doubt it, and I just defended Rush in that he was referring to the rash of phony soldiers, soldiers who fake their service and then claim atrocities.

I don't like it when people deliberately misquote people. It is an assault on their free speech rights.

As a democrat (not a liberal, not a socialist) I cannot stand silent about that.

Moveon.org slandered one of our generals, with no evidence save that his report supported someone they hate.

Rush slandered no one. The context of his program that day, recorded and available, makes that clear.

I do not like Rush's program in that is politically bigoted.

As a man of ethics, I will still defend his free speech.
I'll also defend Mrs. Clinton's reputation from rumor mongering even though I don't plan to vote for her.

Answer 8

The Clintons are merely puppets dancing from the Soros purse strings.

Answer 9

Don't kid yourself.
Limbaugh himself, and Fox News are fanning the fires here.

These are desperate efforts by the 'Right-wing Propaganda Machine' to distract voters from the fact that the GOP has pretty poor Presidential candidates, and is heading for a massive defeat in '08.
'Let's be as divisive and hateful as possible.'

Won't work, though, US voters have learnt their lessons from the 2000 and 2004 elections, and won't be 'distracted' in '08.

Answer 10

Hmmm.... tit for tat.
Remember the Swift Boat dorks?