English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

This is pathetic here everyone saying how it was mclarens fault that Hamilton went out. He was the one driving the car. If he thought the tyres were bad enough he should have made the call to come in.

Was it Mclarens fault that Hamilton couldnt take care of his tyres like the other drivers? No. Was it McLarens fault that he came into the pits too fast? No.

These were his decisions and only his so please people stop talking nonsense. If you want to see how a genuinely intelligent driver makes the right calls on tyres at the right times look at the video on youtube of schumachers first win.

2007-10-06 21:05:41 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Auto Racing Formula One

14 answers

hmm I agree. I was wondering why Kimi's tires weren't as worn out as his. So has everyone else's tires. Only his tires were worn out. And he should have made the call when he started to slip and slide through the track.

So it looks like the pressure's really coming to him. It's ok since he's a rookie. This experience will just make him better in years to come.

Although I'm a ferrari fan, I felt so sad seeing lewis slide through the gravel. I can't believe how he lost control just seconds before! I mean, how could he miss that simple curve with worn out tires? Well, if all goes well, Kimi may still have a chance

2007-10-06 21:18:56 · answer #1 · answered by blitz 3 · 0 0

i don't think you actually grasped the concept, HAMILTON's job is to drive and report on the performance of his vehicle.

orders to pit stop etc come via the radio.
a blind man on a galloping horse could see he was in trouble by over 10 seconds a lap, (in F1 that's a fortnight).

i am not an American with conspiracy theories, but i agree Hamilton played exactly in their hands by putting the car into the gravel trap.

tell me in your wisdom why gamble 6/7 more laps than necessary when he could have finished 2nd or 3rd and guaranteed a mc claren world champion, either way the proof that you need will happen in BRAZIL, until then all the evidence points to a decision being made by Bernie eccelston to keep the championship alive.

2007-10-07 21:46:25 · answer #2 · answered by GIGGS is OO7 © 6 · 0 0

I agree that the consipiracy theory is daft but it shouldn't be just Lewis' fault. He may have felt the tyres feel okay but observers have a better view of how worn the tyres actually are, so it shouldn't be his sole decision. The team should have made it imperative for the tyres to be changed earlier.

2007-10-06 23:07:14 · answer #3 · answered by Naffy 3 · 0 0

It is pathetic that some are coming up with excuses as to why Lewis didn't even finish the race. He should've went in earlier as soon as he knew about the tyres but he didn't want to give up his lead to Kimi. And this was partly the team's fault too.

2007-10-07 22:33:38 · answer #4 · answered by , 7 · 0 0

My brother and his kinfolk, inclusive of my 7 12 months previous nephew, stay in uncomplicated terms some miles from Newtown. i will't look at a image of the infants without seeing his face. i don't know what i might have carried out if his college have been centred. My brother is likewise a member of the Ct legislature. In that skill he met the fairly some father and mom of the murdered infants. He defined it as between the main significant encounters in his lifestyles. No, no person is faking a Goddamn ingredient. i know that an excellent form of the folk who declare they think of it became faked are extremely trolls who're attempting to get an boost out of folk. In my ideas those human beings are even worse than people who're stupid sufficient to have faith the conspiracy nonsense because of the fact they know greater effectual, yet repeat that crap besides.

2016-12-28 18:21:28 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Yo! How is it McLaren's fault Ham,ilton went out? If Hamilton made the decision himself the team should not be blamed. i don't se any reason for McLaren messing it up for him when it's been said that they actually favour him to win the title.

2007-10-07 16:38:44 · answer #6 · answered by purpleCat 6 · 0 0

You forgot to add "royally"!

My feeling is that he talked too much and got himself into a position that demanded a win.

It was his call, he claims his mirrors were too dusty that he couldn't see his rear wheels.

Did you see the Ferrari tyre setup, hard on the left and soft on the right. They played their cards well today, made good use of the flexibility allowed in tyre choice for a wet race. Brilliant Reds and a big blunder by McLaren.

Interestingly, I wonder what Alonso would say against this "conspiracy". Waiting to hear his comments about Hamilton's accident.

2007-10-06 22:03:12 · answer #7 · answered by ? 6 · 2 2

mac you are dead right. he admitted it. the team are also taking some of the responsibility by saying they should have brought him in earlier. had Fernando been in that position he would have just let kimi get on with it. this is where his inexperience shows, but hey, he is a racer and he wanted to be first. maybe he'll be a bit more cautious in Brazil

2007-10-07 12:40:18 · answer #8 · answered by val f1 nutter 7 · 0 0

I agree. Some fans can act like pathetic losers at times

2007-10-07 00:35:01 · answer #9 · answered by The ROCK 4 · 0 0

The only way you can be sure is if you have had access to the radio communications between Lewis and the team. It may have been the team who messed up or it could be him...

2007-10-07 00:04:08 · answer #10 · answered by hickskicks 5 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers