ramesh pawar first of all was good for nothing murli karthik is thirty one years old no use . well onething i don't understand such big crazy cricket country we don't have quality off spinner or a leg spinner , i see that aussies are going to thrash indian a six nil positively god have mercy on indians comment about my views
2007-10-06 20:02:25 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Cricket
BCCI determined to allot a place for a "good for nothing". Hence Ramesh Pawar is replaced by Karthik.
........................v
2007-10-06 23:46:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
If Murali Karthik had got the same support as some other bowlers,he would have been a regular in Indian team.It is a pity that an Indian has to prove his credentials in an alien country(English county in respect of Karthik)
2007-10-07 03:11:43 · answer #2 · answered by karikalan 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think India is just looking for some variety in their bowling, Although Powar is a good bowler, he is not really dominating. He is an off spinner, which we already have, and bringin in Murali Kartik who is a left hand spinner will just give us more variety. Being the die hard Indian fan i am, i dont think India stands a chance anymore.
2007-10-07 04:03:10 · answer #3 · answered by Flova 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They should have selected a youngster instead of Murali Karthik as the focus of Indian team should be for future.
2007-10-07 11:32:21 · answer #4 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hi there ,
"You said it"....
Forget about the combination ....now the situation has come back to square 1 ..
unless the cricket team understand the importance of the words "unity", "national pride", etc etc...the scenario will continue like this only...let it be Ramesh or Murali...let it be Dravid or Dhoni.....let it be Saurav or Tendulkar....!
Yeah..let us enjoy the sixes.........but from the aussies.....
best wishes !
2007-10-07 03:38:52 · answer #5 · answered by suresh k 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
there is no doubt that powar is a good bowler but nowadays he is not in the form or he is affraid of aussies coz he is delivering so many full tosses in a match and full tosses by a spinner means total damage i.e giving about 40 extra runs in a match so i think its a good decision of
2007-10-07 03:32:41 · answer #6 · answered by furious m 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Since, India already has a right arm off spinner harbhajan singh........so ,i think selectors r looking for some variety by giving the left armer a chance........also powar hasnt been in good form off late......
be optimistic dude.......india will come back.....
2007-10-07 05:22:44 · answer #7 · answered by Gagandeep Singh B 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think bcci has chosen kartik as he has done well in the county cricket but he had not played since feb 2006 so he will feel the heat to play against world champs
2007-10-07 05:14:12 · answer #8 · answered by Ashis 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well,if u feel age is a problem,wat about sachin,etc.,the selectors jus tryin' for a change,of course POWAR has been dissapointing,but it wa hi time that the selectors took notice of karthik who got the highest wickets in the eng. county and tats wat they did.
2007-10-07 07:25:33 · answer #9 · answered by Achuthan.R 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
tell me when BCCI done a wise thing....
whatever the changes are done or must be done not going to change anything........
India going to loose the series...
2007-10-07 05:44:32 · answer #10 · answered by M_Ash 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋