He's said alot of things that can't be understood.
2007-10-06 16:41:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by Josh 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
He vetoed the bill because it starts us on the long road to socialized medicine which most people do not want. Think a little instead of sucking up the propaganda from the left.
2007-10-07 00:19:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
The bill is way over the line. This bill is not for the poor, it includes adults and families earning over 80,000 year. That's not poor. He is right to veto and he knows it is another inch toward socialized medicine. Any thinking person knows that is not the answer to anything.
2007-10-06 23:38:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by howdigethere 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Basically, the idea of a national or social health care system really doesn't have a whole lot of support - so rather than try and cram one down our throats, perhaps they are trying to put it into effect one small step at a time.
You know the ol' saying - once the door is cracked open....................
2007-10-06 23:30:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by LeAnne 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
He is just jealous of how efficient government run healthcare would be compared to his administration. EXTREME SARCASM Except for the part criticizing his administration.
2007-10-06 23:32:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by Half-pint 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
It means that it would be a first step towards socializing healthcare. Something every conservative and Bush staunchly oppose.
2007-10-06 23:29:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Let me guess, you're voting for Hildabeast and her socialized healthcare junk, right? Big mistake...don't do it.
2007-10-06 23:30:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by GoodJuJu2U 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
You don't because you don't want to. Therefore, you must be a liberal Democrat.
2007-10-06 23:30:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
You must be a democrat?
2007-10-06 23:28:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by Mercadies2000 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
All damocrats said that.
2007-10-06 23:32:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by chasen54 5
·
0⤊
1⤋