2007-10-06 15:52:29 · 25 answers · asked by Kelly B 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Not likely. Forced to retire with a $500 million dollar severance package would be more like it. Or possibly stay on as a consultant. Paying him by purchase order.
2007-10-06 15:59:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
At this point, it is tough to say what is true and what isn't based on the Democratic party Jeffersonian strategy. You know this strategy, you make negative statements on someones character enough, eventually, it will be perceived as all true.
The only evidence I have are the votes that approved the war in Iraq. That counts for every politician running for president except Giuliani - I don't think Mayors voted.
I think yes, because if a coach (Bush) and let's say TO (Democrats) try to work together, we know what happens - they can't. Who suffers while we fail to work as a team - our soldiers. Who's life is on the line? Our soldiers and they have everyone else speaking for them, but THEM.
2007-10-06 23:02:13 · answer #2 · answered by Hammy 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
GWB would be on the soup line if he ran a company the why he runs this country. Let the jobs go too another country let the price of fuel sky rocket people cant afford to eat are drive and he mess up the quality of life for allot of people.
2007-10-06 23:22:06 · answer #3 · answered by REGINALD H 1 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Shut up about our president.
I bet half of you out there couldn't lead a dehydrated horse to a water bucket!
Until you run for president & can prove yourself,quit following the crowd of disgruntled sourpusses that have nothing better to do than gripe!
2007-10-06 23:08:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
No, but if I were him I'd have fired the people in the country who were doing everything to undermine every last detail he's tried to accomplish!
2007-10-06 23:08:51 · answer #5 · answered by Brianne 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No.
Why is it so hard to believe that he is doing all he can to assure the safety and security of the American people?
If he were to revert back to the previous policies of no response or effective action for the terror attacks against Americans all over the globe - then, yes - I would say, "fire him."
In my opinion, it was this inaction and refusal to confront the Islamic terrorists that culminated in the events of 9/11.
2007-10-06 22:59:30 · answer #6 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
don't think he don't lead many company's . hes a good leader mark my words when a new democrat takes over there will be a attack on the USA and they will say bush could have done more...he news will cry he didnt get the job done ....spend 2 days in iraq and you will change youre mind about gw
2007-10-06 22:58:15 · answer #7 · answered by jim w 5 · 3⤊ 4⤋
He would have been fired right after 9/11.For having allowed 9/11 to happen on his watch!
Why was the 20th hijacker (Moussaoui) in custody for more then two weeks before 9/11 and the plot not foiled?
Seems like at the least incompetence to me!
2007-10-06 22:57:01 · answer #8 · answered by honestamerican 7 · 3⤊ 5⤋
I would like to say yes, cause if you run a company into the ground you would get fired, but now days CEO's get bonuses even when companies lose money, and they have to let people go (million dollar bonuses). rich get richer and poor get poorer
2007-10-06 23:02:42 · answer #9 · answered by jamie s 1 · 1⤊ 4⤋
You should check out his career in the corporate world before trying politics. He was terrible and would've been fired if he wasnt so well connected. He makes me feel ashamed whenever he speaks. He says such dumb things in front of the whole world and people are believing all Americans are like that.
2007-10-06 22:56:33 · answer #10 · answered by CB 7 · 3⤊ 5⤋