I was just wondering, if a goalie plays through all three periods and overtime; but then is switched out for the shootout, is he still the goaltender of record for the game?
2007-10-06 15:34:53 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Hockey
It has happened. The Oil did it a couple years ago before they got Rolly. Markinnen played the game and then they put Conklin in for the SO. Oil lost and Conklin took the loss.
2007-10-06 16:25:42 · answer #1 · answered by PuckDat 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well i dont see why in the world a goalie would be switched after playing the whole game for the shootout.
But i think the goalie playing the game and overtime would be credited with the win or loss. Im not 100% sure though.
ADD: ohh okay, thanks Bob. Didnt know that lol. I guess because Hasek has more experience.
2007-10-06 15:43:48 · answer #2 · answered by |Flames| |Fan| 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'm pretty sure that the goalie on the ice for the game winning goal gets the win, and the goalie on the ice for the opponents' game winning goal gets the loss. I don't know if this applies to shootouts though.
2007-10-06 15:51:03 · answer #3 · answered by N/A 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The goaltender of record is the goalie who was on the ice at the time of the winning goal (or was last on preceding the winning goal in the case of empty-netters)
2007-10-06 16:47:59 · answer #4 · answered by Like I'm Telling You Who I A 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hmmm.... I guess it may be a strategy of sorts,... I mean Giguerre is consistently terrible in the shootout so I wonder why Anaheim hasn't tried the switch in the last season for what you are suggesting... I think it would be appropriate with a goalie who sucks in shootouts (and is above average in regulation).
2007-10-06 16:29:43 · answer #5 · answered by cattledog 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I would hope that it is the goalie that played the game to tie because the shooters who score in any shootout don't have the goals registered to them.
2007-10-06 18:59:07 · answer #6 · answered by Awesome Bill 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually Flames fan, I believe that Detroit did it last year, bringing in Hasek for the SO only. They were heavily criticized for the move just because it was Hasek-bringing in an older guy who is cold with a history of groin problems. Some guys are better in the SO so it has been known to happen.
2007-10-06 15:48:17 · answer #7 · answered by Bob Loblaw 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not so ridiculous, actually. I'd imagine the sub would get the W if his team won since he was the one in net during the SO.
Interesting observation.
2007-10-06 15:45:05 · answer #8 · answered by zapcity29 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Actually, smart question, i wouldnt know, It could be argued both ways.
2007-10-06 15:46:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
see goalienation.com
thanks for asking
2007-10-06 15:45:59 · answer #10 · answered by Regie May P 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋