[are they lying cowards]
yes.
2007-10-06 12:08:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by Lavrenti Beria 6
·
5⤊
11⤋
No secret that liberals do not certainly love "unfastened speech" whilst it is not going their way. check out any debatable conservative attempting to furnish a lecture at a school campus and you will see what I recommend. Liberals hate that. of direction, i think of Limbaugh and something would desire to be reigned in somewhat because of the fact they are merchandising people a twisted bill of things. Too undesirable Lewis Black and Dennis Miller do not do a prepare jointly. that could be astonishing.
2016-10-21 06:39:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by balsamo 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Are you familiar with how "Block User" works? It just puts a red circle with a slash, the universal "No" symbol, next to that user's name. It IDs that person (to the one who blocked him) as a "Troll", or someone whose opinions are so repugnant to the Blocker they don't want to know what other questions this person has posted. It also keeps that person from harrassing the one doing the blocking with unwanted emails.
It doesn't stop Free Speech in any way. You are still entitled to post whatever you wish to in here, subject to the Terms of Service agreement.
But that doesn't mean I HAVE TO READ IT.
Blocking someone (and consequently wasting no further time or effort on them), who isn't asking questions with a genuine interest in learning something new, is just good time management in Yahoo Answers.
If your definition of "Free Speech" means I have to READ ALL OPINIONS, do you also run the Playboy Channel in front of your pre-teen children during the evening? Why not? Don't you believe in "Free Speech"?
2007-10-06 12:30:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
You pick the bad ones and use that to paint a picture of the whole group. Most liberals do believe in free speech and don't do crap like that.
2007-10-06 12:40:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
If by "block" you mean a personal block, then they just don't like conservative ideas.
Freedom of speech, and freedom to ignore others speech. That doesnt mean the liberals are preventing others from reading conservative ideas.
2007-10-06 12:26:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mr. Dog 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yes, yes, right . Stop avoiding me and stop preventing me from harassing you ! I too HATE it when that happens.
Rotten Libs, how dare you duck when I hurl invective at you!
Stand up and take my " free exchange of ideas " !
Yeah, right. By the way, from your tone I still do believe in free speech. I also know abuse when I hear it.
No one is stopping you from saying anything. Nothing comp ells me to have to LISTEN to it either
2007-10-06 12:14:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Just like Sen. Harry Reid. He condemned Rush Limbaugh on the Senate floor for speaking his mind. Actually, Rush was quoted out of context as well.
The libs only believe in "their" free speech. I have never heard so much opposition to Fox News and O'Reilly too, maybe it's because the truth hurts the libs.
2007-10-06 12:19:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
I don't block anybody, and I'm sure most liberals don't either. So you're statement is false. I do believe in free speech for all.
And don't call me a lying coward.
2007-10-06 12:08:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by Mitchell 5
·
9⤊
3⤋
Hah! I just asked a question bordering on the same thing.
It seems liberals only believe in freedom of speech when it benefits their agenda. When it doesn't, its just another abstract piece of trash.
2007-10-06 12:20:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
believing in free speech sounds really good
2007-10-06 12:09:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by John C 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
Hey, talk to Bush Family Member, one of the neocons who blocks everyone who disagrees with him or her. Lying cowards know no party affiliation.
2007-10-06 12:09:18
·
answer #11
·
answered by iwasnotanazipolka 7
·
3⤊
4⤋