1360?
2007-10-07 01:14:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
For the best answers, search on this site https://shorturl.im/awZ3W
The volume displacement of an engine is a fairly simple measurement and engne builders cc their engines to ensure each cylinder has equal volume which would promote balance when running. Whether it is measured in liters (L), cubic centimeters (cc) or in cubic inches (ci) makes no difference. In Europe it has always been cc and L, even for the big, powerful engines such as Ferrari and Lamborghini. In the United States we had cubic inches but because we are trying to come up with a globally recognized measuring system, we've chosen to adopt cc or L instead of ci. Here is how volume displacement is measured in engines: With the head(s) off the engine, each piston would be measured at the bottom of it's stroke. A thick acrylic panel would be placed over the engine block in place of the head. Over each piston bore there would be a hole to introduce water. With the piston in the fully down position, the volume from the top of the piston to the top of the block would be accurately measured by filling the volume with water until there is no air bubbles under the plastic. The amount of water it takes to fill is the volume of that particular cylinder. Do that to all cylinders and add up the results. We do the same procedure to the heads to determine the combustion chamber volume. With the valves fully shut, introduce water until no air bubbles exist. Add the volume to that cylinder's volume already obtained and you will have the total capacity of that cylinder. Add up all total capacities and you would have the volume displacement of that engine. The engine would run one heck of a lot better if each and every piston/combustion chamber volume was exactly the same. Then, with exact metering of a fuel/air mixture, the power developed would be the same for each cylinder and the engine would run smooth and powerful. The 1.14 L (~17.39cc/cylinder) engine is only 69.56707 cubic inches so we aren't talking about too much power here but modern 4 banger engines have been found to take that minute amount of power and get a vehicle to act pretty peppy. With gas prices nearing $3/gal, we need real performance and not just overcoming obstacles with brute force.
2016-04-10 05:27:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
1000cc equal 1 litre,
therefore 1.4 litres equal 1000 x 1.4 = 1400 cc
** update **
It`s a simple question, "how many cc's is a 1.4 litre engine?"
As a fluid measure then the answer is 1400cc, if I was wishing to convert the measurements within any engine then I would never get an exact figure because this measurement involves pi. Pi is an irrational number, therefore no measurement of surface area or volume can be exact.
2007-10-06 10:03:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
You must be very old, not to know anything about the metric system of measurement. I did the full system at school, in the'60's! I unit e.g. Litre is 1000 thousand small.e mill, units.
Therefore 1.4 lt is 1,400.
Of course, if your talking about a car, the unit is rounded and you need to know the exact model. Of course, the easy way is to look in the V5C, log book.
2007-10-07 02:37:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
1398. I`ve read the rest and I`ve changed my mind , Is your engine giving you bother if not what the hell difference does it make how many "cc"`s are in it. Bet you a pound to a 1millimetre pisshole that no two engines are the same.Apologies to Paul and Emma.
2007-10-06 09:56:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
1
2017-02-20 01:10:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
it is sapost to be 1400 cc but it can be 1350 -1399 they round the numbers off
2007-10-06 10:34:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by mushroom 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
1400
2007-10-06 10:10:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by Bohdan K 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
It can be anywhere from 1350 to 1449 cc, they round it up or down.
2007-10-06 10:30:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Should be 1400 cc's but more likely to be 1396 cc's.
2007-10-06 09:56:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋