Or would it be kind of fair?
and balanced.
2007-10-06 09:13:58 · 5 answers · asked by oohhbother 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Ever heard of, read, or written a Letter to the Editor?
Newspapers already do print responses.
2007-10-06 09:24:58 · update #1
Nope - it would encourage it.
I love how the hate radio nazis can say the most irresponsible assertions, lies, and fantasy - but cons will claim only "responsible" speech should be free.
Nutjobs.
2007-10-06 09:27:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It would only be fair and balanced if newspapers had to print (and give equal space) to opposing views, and if the network and cable stations did the same.
There is nothing fair about imposing regulations on only one media outlet (radio) while allowing the rest (print, television, Internet) to remain biased.
To take it further, would bloggers or webmasters be obligated to let other people post opposing views on their websites? It would be fair and balanced...
2007-10-06 16:22:17 · answer #2 · answered by ItsJustMe 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Wouldn't prevent free speech, it should encourage it
2007-10-06 16:44:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Free speech. Free speech. Free speech?
What about responsible speech?
2007-10-06 16:17:50 · answer #4 · answered by Barry auh2o 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No it would encourage free response!~!
2007-10-06 16:26:23 · answer #5 · answered by Hunter 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋