Of course! Silly questions will obviously attract sill answers all the time!!!
2007-10-06 09:08:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Yes I think you're right. Not because everyone writes silly answers to silly questions cause some people, like me, tend to take matters like these very seriously.
However, from my perspective even if the answer is serious it can still be called silly because no-one but a silly person would write a serious answer to a silly question - thus rendering their answer silly...
... I think?
2007-10-06 09:16:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by Joe 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
For some strange reason people seem to give a more serious answer to a silly question and silly answers to a serious question. This section can be a lot of fun but very backwards as well that way.
2007-10-06 09:10:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Not really, when I ask a silly question people laugh at me and I get no answer.
2007-10-09 00:49:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
like attracts like? No, not every silly question will get a silly answer but your percentage goes up if you get a silly look on your face when you ask it :)
2007-10-06 11:01:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes, to silly questions...silly answers.
2007-10-07 02:51:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think at least a 98% chance you will get silly responses
2007-10-07 14:19:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If your asking me, yes. Silly putty. Is that a silly answer? It's 3:00 AM. I can't think.
2007-10-06 23:36:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by Old Woman 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
No. You'd be amazed at how many people take my silly questions seriously! They take the time to write serious and, frequently, big answers, and I end up feeling a little guilty...
2007-10-06 14:37:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by Moon :) 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
seem, Rick Perry is utilising Bush Jrs recreation plan. Evangelicals are falling for it as quickly as extra. Bush sr. began the North American Union conspiracy, and Bush Jr. almost finished it. Bush jr. intentionally waited till the top of his president to bypass yet another amnesty whilst he could desire to have used 9/11 to look after the border and bypass one final amnesty. it fairly is relatively obtrusive what the democrats and human beings like Rick Perry attempt to do. actually, Rick Perry does not have jumped into the race different than he observed Mitt Romney became going to take it fairly and Mitt committed himself in the 2008 election 'not extra amnesties.' this u . s . won't proceed to exist as a Capitalist, English conversing, Christian u . s . if we will not even end unlawful Immigration, much less criminal Immigration from the Mid East. yet another excuse to supprt Mitt in spite of the fact that he's no longer a real conservative, is that at this factor, a real conservative can not win the Presidency. in straightforward terms a average can win the Presidency. optimistically, if we shop educating people who will replace, yet for now, Mitt or Herman Cain is our suitable probability of having Obama out, and all of us understand that Obama has been the grasp of deception.
2016-10-10 10:28:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by barbary 4
·
0⤊
0⤋