English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-10-06 08:12:32 · 17 answers · asked by megalomaniac 7 in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

I've got nothing against catching a fish and eating it if you are hungry but I just don't understand how an ethical person can justify torturing an animal just for fun.

2007-10-06 08:53:03 · update #1

We seem to think that just because it has scales instead of fur and because it lives in the water instead of on land that its OK to do whatever we want to them. If it was a cute little furry land animal do you think there would even be a debate?

2007-10-06 08:54:00 · update #2

17 answers

I'd rather watch corn grow.

2007-10-06 08:16:54 · answer #1 · answered by Tony S 4 · 1 0

capture and launch carried out properly isn't risky to any fish. i'm no longer likely to lie and say that every person fish proceed to exist capture and launch. Fish, while caught, post a great combat and this builds acids of their physique. those acids could be risky or maybe deadly to a fish. The longer the combat the fewer probability they have of surviving, extremely for the period of warmer climate. Conservation minded anglers understand this capture 22 situation and take a inspect to land the fish as quickly as achievable and take the time to ensure the fish is in a position earlier freeing it to steer away from predation via different species and with the intention that we supply the species a greater effectual probability at surviving. We do what we can to guard on a similar time as enjoying the sport. Doing different sensible could be non efficient and risky to our fishery. I would desire to be honest approximately this yet i think of you're dad is greater substantial than purely thoughts you have for a fish or any wild lifestyles your bleeding coronary heart cries out for. perhaps that's time your coronary heart reaches out for Dad, the guy who raised you which ones incorporate mom. Dads are not constantly appropriate yet he tried to be via giving up a factor of himself to your sake. If it is not love, show him what's. ~good success catchin'.

2016-12-28 17:40:12 · answer #2 · answered by laurella 4 · 0 0

Acceptable by what standards? Catch and EAT fishing is considered by most to be an acceptable past time. We're the top of the food chain; it's only human nature.

2007-10-06 08:16:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It's a great topic of 'watercooler conversation' for the fish.
Bob: yesterday, i saw this tasty worm in the water, and when i ate it, these alien creatures used some kind of force field and abducted me. they were in this strange vessel that actually FLOATED on the water, yet it seems as if it were NOT dead!
these aliens had brown moss on top of their heads, eyes that opened and closed, and long, skinny fins that tapered into points that they used to release me from the force field. besides hurting my mouth a little , i felt ok. then they flashed a bright light at me that lasted at most a millisecond, slapped each other on those pointy extensions of their fins and set me loose!
Rick: RIGHT, Bob! got any more 'fish tales'?

2007-10-06 08:30:17 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't know why anyone would want to torture an animal and then throw it back in the water so that maybe they can do it again later.

2007-10-06 08:15:44 · answer #5 · answered by Sarah B 5 · 1 0

Yes, unfortunately some breeds of fish are almost certain to die if hooked, yet well meaning game regulations force you to release them.

2007-10-06 08:17:08 · answer #6 · answered by Michael F 3 · 0 0

How would you feel if I jabbed a hook in your mouth, pulled you out of your home into an atmosphere you can't breath in, tore out the hook, cutting you up really bad only to toss you back in. Sport fishing is a cruel, traumatic thing.

People are stupid, we actually say (and in a very large circle of people, believe) that a living thing can't feel it and make a sport out of it. How cruel can we get?

2007-10-06 08:16:31 · answer #7 · answered by Dr. E. Bunny A.K.A. Andy. 7 · 3 1

No, why would you want to take the time & catch them if you can't keep them & eat them. I love fish!!!!

2007-10-06 08:17:37 · answer #8 · answered by shalia s 3 · 0 0

I don`t fish myself, but it1s better than keeping them all, and not leaving any for the next guy.

2007-10-06 08:16:53 · answer #9 · answered by jms043 7 · 0 0

Why not? You can buy fish in the store these days. Don't you know that?

2007-10-06 08:16:08 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It wouldn't be my choice, but it's ok if the fish aren't harmed.

2007-10-06 08:19:24 · answer #11 · answered by Georgie 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers