English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Do you agree the proper role of government is to provide for the people only those critical functions that cannot be performed by individuals or private organizations and that the best government is that which governs least?

2007-10-06 07:22:52 · 5 answers · asked by mission_viejo_california 2 in Politics & Government Politics

5 answers

Yes absolutely.

I believe that it is part of the government's responsibility of this great nation to make sure this nation stays great.

In performing this job, it is the duty of the government to aid in providing the basic necessities to maintain a civilized society.

2007-10-10 03:04:02 · answer #1 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 0 0

some human beings tend to forget a million, that a central authority is a team of people given the activity of premier a society to a much better state "the government is my Shepherd I shall no longer desire" 2, place brings with it responsibly, and not power. 3, it fairly is greater basic in charge others than to discover a answer to the real subject The strategies of any chief are human beings who they lead, a bad workmen blades his strategies. 4, If human beings are consistently instructed by using mass exposure that they desire, desire, can no longer do without, and are not something in the event that they don't have. Then they're going to do what ever they could to be what they have been instructed to be. 5, gross inequality breads discontent. 6, human beings persist with the occasion set by using others and if the ruling type reveal that greed,deception, robbery, and homicide is the occasion then that's what you have got on your society. 7, If the treatment isn't working and the affected person is getting worse it's time to alter the treatment. 8, the international isn't Black and White, there is often yet another alliterative!

2016-11-07 10:50:23 · answer #2 · answered by tschannen 4 · 0 0

When it comes to the US becoming the police, judge, and jury for the world, then I agree 100%.

However, when conservatives talk about "privatizing" government services, you are really talking about squeezing out costs and reducing government services. This means less money is spent on roads, public transportation, public schools, libraries, public health programs, environmental regulation, dams, bridges, and New-Orleans style levies.

When the levies break or public health care is not available, this hurts middle and lower income folks the most. Harper's magazine just published an article about how the economics of disasters and how our country is starting to look like Bagdad.

In Bagdad, the green zone is surrounded by a five-foot thick concrete wall and it has electricty, clean water, safety, food, fuel, and everyting you need for a comfortable life. In America, the green zone is represented by the gated community. In the green zone, everyone can afford medical insurance and they can hire private security.

The United States is ranked 37th for health care. To me, the average French person has a better life. (Their health care system is ranked #1.) Although you'd never get that understanding from the US media.

In the red zone, things can be dangerous, health care can be unaffordable. It's clear where the US is headed.

2007-10-06 07:48:46 · answer #3 · answered by Skeptic 7 · 0 1

Yeah, definitely. The current state of government in the U.S. really, really worries me.

2007-10-06 07:26:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Not really, read "Leviathan" by Thomas Hobbes.

2007-10-06 07:32:09 · answer #5 · answered by Strats!! 4 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers