2007-10-06 07:01:56 · 7 answers · asked by Jeganath 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Which nuclear deal... I am on the left and I agree with the NPT, ABM, etc...
2007-10-10 03:01:53 · answer #1 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
India has to advance its capability technology via 70,000 MW over the subsequent 10 to fifteen years to confirm usual progression of the economy. even nonetheless we've extensive coal reserves, we could desire to continually seek for cleanser possibilities like Nuclear capability and organic gas. we will additionally could decrease our dependence on imported oil because of the fact the reserves are constrained and fees of crude oil are sky rocketing. we could desire to continually sign the nuclear take care of united statesa. so as that we are in a position to get get entry to to nuclear gas, technologies and funds. Left events are opposing the deal to guard its vote monetary corporation in Bengal & Kerala. This opposition will could be disregarded interior the generic interest of the country as an entire. Our indegenous nuclear enegy application has not made lots progression through denial of get entry to to recent technologies and certain sources of Uranium. The calculation of fee is extra powerful left to economists and undertaking managers extremely than scientists. as quickly as we get get entry to to new technologies, our scientists will could strengthen their analyze on Thorium because of the fact the only gas so as that we are in a position to sidestep dependence of imported Uranium.
2016-11-07 10:49:00 · answer #2 · answered by tschannen 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What nuclear deal?
2007-10-06 07:30:05 · answer #3 · answered by fangtaiyang 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sir
Walkman, Walk disc. Now walk in the moon or on the moon by Japan? Not surprised. It is a power IT country.
I thank you
Firozali A.Mulla MBA PhD
P.O.Box 6044
Dar-Es-Salaam
Tanzania
East Africa
2007-10-06 07:30:12 · answer #4 · answered by Firozali A M 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nuclear deal? which one would you be referring to? if you are referring to building them, its because we pay billions to build them only to pay it once again to have them dismantled.
If you are referring to getting rid of them all, its because we aren't really getting rid of them, only paying to have them dismantled and replaced with something else, that we'll have to also pay to have dismantled by the very same people we paid to build them.
its a real good scam.
if you are referring to nuclear power, no real objection here, as soon as more research is done to find a feasible way to deal with the waste.
2007-10-06 07:06:17 · answer #5 · answered by avail_skillz 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I agree with avail_skillz above.
2007-10-06 07:12:40 · answer #6 · answered by Zardoz 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
osama would love for us to build more nuclear plants.
2007-10-06 07:11:44 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋