Sociology - crime?

Question

Why are the incidences of crime higher in the inner cities than the more affluent suburbs?

I need to write a lengthy essay on this,any help appreciated.

Answer 1

Because there is more people.

Answer 2

There is an argument that poor environment causes crime. See Alice Coleman about how the poor design/layout of much of the 1950's, 1960's and 70's built social housing found in many of our cities contributed towards increased incidence of streetcrime (eg a lack of defensible space- a bit of land/fencing to call your own between your home 'your space' and the public pavement) discourages street crime. Also, kids in the suburbs will have books and computers at home and parents that encourage them to achieve at school. Inner City schools are more likely to have children attending where English is not a first language and have children of single parent families.The school results tables will confirm that kids in suburban areas generally do better. This all affects crime. Drugs are available anywhere but maybe more prevalent in the inner cities.

There are always exceptions to this though.

Answer 3

If you're talking about property crimes, then it is easier to burgle a home in the inner city where there is less security than it is to burgle a more secured suburban home.

You should consider the different forms of crime that might happen in the more affluent areas. More white collar crime will happen there, but it goes unnoticed because our only major sources of crime information are police recorded crimes and the British Crime Survey, which is a victim survey and doesn't ask about white collar crimes because the victims most likely wouldn't be too aware of it.

I'm not naming any names for you, you can look those up for yourself, I'm just helping you with ideas to examine. Go and do some reading. I'll give you a hint... my second point involved conflict theories. Go read!

Answer 4

inner cities have lived through loss in the circumstances of urban poverty,and in the suburbs they do not live through poverty.AIDS came to the inner city in all the well-known ways, but overwhelmingly by way of
intravenous drug abuse. Drugs and drug dealing are everywhere. The dealers have cars and sharp
clothes. They provide employment opportunities, even to kids too small to even tie their own shoes. having kids to steal.The manufacturing
base that once absorbed large numbers of the young, marginally educated urban poor has long
since moved elsewhere, typically to underdeveloped countries.
That so many young adults seem directionless, discouraged, and disaffected is no surprise,
given their circumstances and the circumstances of their childhood. some grow up and do the right thing others just cant get it right.Many children
really do feel that they are safer if they carry knives or guns. By far the majority of these incidents are therefore not high-profile cases and house robberies most frequently occur in the more affluent suburbs becuse they have money and nicer things.

Answer 5

Crime is highter in inner cities:-
Higher population
Higher unemployment
Low wages
Education
And when all these groups of people are living in one area incidences of crime are bound to be higher.

In the more affluent suburbs:-
Less populated
Less unemployment
More educated

Answer 6

Inner cities hold a higher population of people, most of whom are not wealthy, even homeless, or not very far beyond the poverty line. At times desperate, defensive, and depressed. A lack of money means a lack of security, confidence, or stability. There is more mental illness, due to lack of meds, stress, or poor abusive environments. Poor Health, due to lack of proper insurance or preventive medicine. Lack of proper food, or education are also factors..... A good analogy would be, the affluent suburbs are the dogs that were each given a juicy steak every day. The inner city dogs were given left over bones too share...What do you think the natural survivor instincts would tell these dogs to do????

Answer 7

Well, I think the crime is high in the inner cities for several reasons. I think for one, drugs play a huge role in the crime rate. In the city it is more common in the streets. All of the bars in the city contribute to this. The noise level in the city. The higher cost of living. The closeness of people, feeling the stress of being invaded. The drugs, the alcohol, the noise, the intrusive people, no privacy. I think that these things that the city offers, makes it easy for crime to happen. Good luck!

Answer 8

Within the city one has less geographic space and more of every kind of humanity crushed in together. Poorer neighborhoods are often responsible for disproportionately increasing an urban county's crime statistic. The poor don't have the money they need, are often from low income families and the people grew up frustrated by violent crime, gang violence as well as drug and alcohol addiction as an awful childhood example of how to behave.

Answer 9

It depends which city you have in mind. Criminality usually go with pauperty, lack of integration, cultural conflicts etc. which part of the city this things inhabit depends on the historical develoment of the city.

A look at the classic studies of Chicago School could provide some interesting insights. Later works of conflict sociology could help too

Answer 10

Functionalist: Deviance could be seen to be banned or controlled habit it fairly is possibly to entice the two punishment, disapproval or the two (Downes & Rock, 1988). Functionalists view society as consistent with shared consensus and the proliferation of this shared consensus by way of socialization by skill of institutions. This makes it extremely confusing for them to handle the belief of crime and deviance- because of the fact in a proper Functionalist society, crime and deviance does not take place. on an identical time as some Functionalist theorists, notably Durkheim, regard crime as having a social function, others, which contain Merton, who factor to the stress between socialized targets and actuality because of the fact the actual reason at the back of crime. Durkheim (1897) argues that crime and deviance are useful and needed in society. Interactionist: ·Interactionist theories communicate how behaviors emerge as defined as deviant; interactionists argue that deviance is a negotiated concept (a technique). Howard Becker is the main influential theorist in the interactionist view of deviance. He claimed that: one million.persons seek for to impose their ‘order’ or their ‘actuality’ on others 2.great scale examples of this are the regulation on hashish it fairly is imposed for political purposes (if it grew to become into in basic terms a wellness reason then tobacco and alcohol would additionally be banned 3.Small scale examples contain the flexibility of an educator or a be certain to impact the form of a guy or woman by skill of ‘self-friendly prophecy’ 4.He progressed the labeling concept that explains the above factor and shows the way it efficiently differences the direction of people’s lives and could lead directly to a deviant occupation direction.

Answer 11

The percentage is the same, the incidences are only higher due to higher population.