English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

why would buildings that were designed to survive being hit by plane completly collapse?

2007-10-06 05:38:44 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Government

thanks to the few of you with working brains of your own that do not run off the spin machines!!! to the rest of you check out JUSTIN H.'S answer!!!
sad to see so many blind!!!

2007-10-06 06:00:23 · update #1

18 answers

you would probably be interested in googling PNAC extremely interesting study done by a group that incudes rumsfeld, cheney, wolfowitz and most other people in Bush's administration the study was done by pnac between 1997 and 2000 it states that to increase the funding for the military industrial complex they would need to have a new war on many fronts focusing on the middle east. To spur the american public into allowing this war to happen there would need to be an\ "Pearl Harbor like catastrophic event to happen". This all can be found in the published literature that is signed off on by these people here on their own site.

http://www.newamericancentury.org/

2007-10-06 05:52:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I didn't know anyone saw demolition charges planted anywhere on the twin towers. You really saw them? Did you photograph them?. By the way the World Trade Center was not designed to survive a "hit by a plane".

2007-10-06 12:44:13 · answer #2 · answered by fangtaiyang 7 · 5 0

It was designed to take a hit from a plane that was not fully loaded with fuel and powering down in foggy conditions, an accident.

This was a full speed slam, loaded to the gills with fuel that sliced right through and weakened the structure.

Even tough the temperature did not hit 'melting point" is can still soften to the point where structural integrity is compromised

2007-10-06 13:17:02 · answer #3 · answered by Experto Credo 7 · 1 0

The alternative to the explosive charges that you saw are in the answers of Physics. When a square room is filled with air that can't escape fast enough while being compressed by the ceiling collapsing onto the floor. It would push the air out by way of the windows and near the beams to create that explosion look.

2007-10-06 12:51:36 · answer #4 · answered by _Animal_ 3 · 1 1

No your not the only one. There is a basket full of kooks just like you scattered all over the place that believe this type of trash. You people have become so annoying with your propaganda horsesh#@. Don't you think maybe it's time to get a life and even a job and climb back into the real world? God, you guys are stupid.

2007-10-06 15:47:52 · answer #5 · answered by doctdon 7 · 2 0

Really? Were you in the buildings prior to the attack and saw these charges? Can you explain why nobody else in those buildings noticed those charges?

If you are talking about video footage, do you have the necessary expertise in explosives and structural engineering to properly evaluate what you saw? (For example - if explosives were used, why didn't the smoke ejected from the sides of the building have the distinctive coloration that comes for explosives? (Are you aware that people who have been around explosives can usually identify the type of explosive from the color of the smoke it produces?)

2007-10-06 13:12:35 · answer #6 · answered by MikeGolf 7 · 2 0

There are a number of good books out there that debunk many of the myths concerning 9/11. I suggest you read a couple of them to get your facts straight. Are you a conspiracy buff or just gullible (I don't mean to be nasty but it is a fact of life that a lot of people are gullible about some things). Don't get sucked in my these conspiracy theories.

2007-10-06 12:51:02 · answer #7 · answered by SgtMoto 6 · 4 1

You did? What did they look like? If you saw them, why didn't you go tell someone so they could be removed? Are you in on it? Seems to me the FBI should be talking to you.

2007-10-06 12:48:56 · answer #8 · answered by AmericanPatriot 6 · 3 1

no at least 20 more people did as well, every one else saw the cold reality of engineering faults cause by extreme heat from the fire of all the jet fuel.

2007-10-06 12:47:21 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Yes you were the one and only who saw those charges.

2007-10-06 12:41:44 · answer #10 · answered by Glen B 6 · 4 1

fedest.com, questions and answers