The two hour debut of TNA Impact wasn't a bad show.
Some complain that Impact opened with Rhyno vs. Black Reign. One questions, wasn't it nice to actually see Rhyno on television again in a match instead of just a run-in to make the save? The match will never win match of the year but there was more wrestling from Rhyno and Black Reign in the opening match than we see in most WWE matches that don't involve Triple H, London, or Kendrick.
The Gail Kim match had more wrestling in that single match than the WWE had had all year in the Womens' Division. Good performance from Gail Kim and Jackie Moore. If Womens' Wrestling begins to take off, thank these two performers for improving the current view of Womens' Wrestling, which in the WWE is a joke.
Low points on Impact were the Angle/Sting segments. There were too many Angle promos. I can see one or two promos but not three or four (or more) during the show. Too much.
On a sidenote, I was suprised TNA didn't have something "special" planned, like a debut or an earth-shattering discovery or angle. However, even without a shocking suprise, TNA managed to deliver a solid first show. Maybe TNA is trying to give us a quality wrestling show as opposed to shiocking moments that generate short-term interest? Who know? ... Decent two hour debut for TNA.
2007-10-06 14:53:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by DeadSurvivor 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Heven't seen it yet Impact Man
The local indy wrestling Gen X had a show here on thursday Night I was at it.
You know Shane101 on here?
He both Refs and Wrestles for them.
I am sure going to watch the replay tonight though.
TNA is by far the best US Promotion right now, and currently smokes the WWE which is in the worst downturn I've seen since I've been watching wrestling (1982)
TNA is amazing
Sting, Kurt Angle, Senshi, Jay Lethal, Petey Williams, Christian Cage, AJ Styles, Rhyno
They're some of the best talent around today.
You got my vote Impact Man..
TNA Rocks!
2007-10-06 07:25:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
It wasn't that bad but........ This was the first 2 hour show they should have been putting up a PPV quality type of show on the air.Insted we got a normal show that was 2 hours.There is a lot of great talant at TNA.I blame the writers for not giving these guys decent storylines to follow.Ownership should be takeng some of the blame for hiring a guy like Pac Man Jones not to wrestle.It is just stupid decisions like this that will keep the WWE from trying to compete with TNA.
2007-10-06 06:47:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by terry v 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It started with Rhino vs. friggin' Black Reign. Why start off your huge two hour premiere with two former WWE/ECW guys, when TNA is supposed to be the anti-WWE, the alternative? They would have been better off here starting with their younger guys, like the MCMGs vs. XXX, or something that had to do with one of their BFG main events. And plus it seems like they're still trying to rush things, like they're trying to get in ten superstars per segment, despite the fact that they added in an hour.
The debut was fairly decent, but they could have done so much better, since it seems like the same old terrible Impact, except with an extra hour of it taped on.
2007-10-06 07:35:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by AmDrag5000 (dont stop believin) 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
TNA Impact showing up to 2 hours was awesome! TNA is getting bigger and gaining more fan following. WWE must not pretend anymore that TNA doesn't exist. TNA! TNA! TNA!
2007-10-06 05:36:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by Madz 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
I thought it was awesome. Especially the gauntlet match. Some great wrestling for a change!
2007-10-06 08:26:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by borntobefree 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
U most be stupid.I've watch these guys who have ragged WWE and talked up TNA for the past year and their completely pisted at TNA.I mean their turning into the WWE.They are having stupid angles and are pushing the wrong guys.I mean when is the last time u have seen a title on AJ Styles the man who is responsible for TNA being where it is today.WHEN????Probably a year and a half ago.
2007-10-06 05:18:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
they call them selves the new face of pro wrestling when i saw the same people that i saw a year ago and the only reason wwe isn't putting in new names is because nothin looks godd right now none from ovw is ready and no one from tna is ready so wwes raw was bettr i taped the 2 hour premere and it was so boring that the next day i had to tape sd ovr it
2007-10-06 05:44:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by seth w 2
·
0⤊
3⤋
Diehard WWE fans!!!! They are not going to tell you it is good because, they feel that they will be embracing another wrestling!!! To me it was awesome!!! I can't wait for the next show!!!
2007-10-06 07:45:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Dude, TNA is for losers. Its a complete waste of time. Its more boring than Evil Dead. Its like Total Non-stop Acting.
2007-10-06 05:21:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by Voldemort 2
·
0⤊
3⤋