Note: Before you guys go on some immature rant about "libtards", please note that I am not insinuating that only conservatives voted for the war or that only conservatives are interested in continuing it.
It is just the observation that the majority of people who support this war on terror are republicans.
With that in mind, answer the question. Is it when there are no more terrorists in the world? When Iraq is in peace? When we capture osama?
When?
2007-10-06 03:18:56 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
"War on Terror"...ahem thats code for "War on Islam" so it will perpetuate...until cons can Thermonuke the enitre middle east and any other iota of Islam in the world...dont worry though by that time we will prolly be the official "Global Enforcers of peace".
2007-10-06 03:22:47 · answer #1 · answered by gundam_bravo4 3 · 2⤊ 4⤋
If we capture or kill Osama , there will be another Osama. Irag in peace (with no dictatorship) that will help, but not win the war on terror. The real answer is, never. There will always be terrorists. We have to maintain security in the States to keep them from bringing the war to our soil.
2007-10-06 03:56:53 · answer #2 · answered by Benny 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm not a fortune teller so i can't predict the future. I know if we give up like a lot of liberals want us to do, it will go own much longer. Capturing Osama will not end the war on terrorism and it's very foolish to believe that. Do you honestly think that if we do catch him, then all terrorists will lay down their arms and join our side? This isn't the Wizard of Oz with the wicked witch of the west.
2007-10-06 03:50:55 · answer #3 · answered by - 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It depends on how it will be fought.
The present method of warfare being used by the USA is trying to limit as many innocent deaths and destruction of property as possible. Under these rules of engagement, it can last a very long time.
If, however, the USA starts to fight the war with the same level of death and destruction it inflicted on the civilian population as it did during WWII, it could be over in a matter of weeks.
If the terrorists escalate the conflict, say by exploding a nuclear device in one of our cities, it may be very likely we will retaliate by incinerating large population areas in the middle east.
A war doesn't end until one side or the other decides the amount of death and destruction isn't worth the struggle. That point hasn't yet been reached.
2007-10-06 03:37:08 · answer #4 · answered by Perplexed Bob 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The war will be over when all idealogues realize that we can live in peace together if we respect each other.
Of course since the left and the right cant even be civil in this country together, the odds of that happening are about none.
2007-10-06 03:35:18 · answer #5 · answered by Alan C 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
When islamofascists around the world stop being terrorists. You liberals need to study history and you will see that muhammad himself started this war and it won't end any time soon. The koran clearly outlines the terrorist strategy for islamofascists to follow, and all liberals are in danger of being killed by islamofascists who they regard as infidels. Read 8:12 in the koran and you will see that it tells muslims to chop the heads off of infidels, and allah brags about being a terrorist.
Wake up and smell the jihad.
2007-10-06 03:34:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Democrat here.
Never. Can't be. There will always be terrorism.
But the alternative is to let it grow so vast that we have a 9/11.
We have a daily war on disease.
If the alternative is to withdraw and let disease win, thank you, I'll take the war.
If the alternative is to withdraw and let terrorism grow, thank you, I'll take the war.
Seems kind of silly to imagine we would just stop fighting something that wants us dead.
2007-10-06 03:28:30 · answer #7 · answered by mckenziecalhoun 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
in case you are able to undergo in strategies whilst Obama grew to become into working for place of work between the suitable memories grew to become into "Is he a secret Muslim?" This in basic terms illustrates how media slurs issues to greater healthful their time table. some people certainly believed that if he grew to become right into a Muslim he could not be the President. maximum conservatives are Christians and maximum Christians are illiberal of alternative religions and cultures. they are in basic terms illiberal and ignorant (not conservatives, however the people who have faith we are at conflict with Islam). however, i will furnish Bush props for pointing out that we weren't at conflict with Islam.
2016-10-21 05:34:57 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it should be done once a stable government is solidly in place in Iraq and can fend for itself. I do believe that this is why we are there now. Complaints about oil are only political rantings designed to destroy Bush at all costs. Continuing the liberal media rampage.
2007-10-06 03:24:58 · answer #9 · answered by Robert S 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
When Iraq and Afghanistan are stable countries and the people of these countries can live without fear and in peace. When Pakistan gives up osama bin laden
2007-10-06 03:31:44 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Well I can't add to this but Mcenzie hits it right on the head.I hope he gets the 10 points.That was a great answer.
2007-10-06 08:17:03 · answer #11 · answered by ak6702 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋