No, war and minimal health care is a Liberal Democrat solution for everything.
I could list all the scummy things Democrats have done from supporting slavery and opposing civil rights to stripping the military, including medical care, throughout the nineties.
Take a basic anti-mugging class and figure out that:
When you look weak and helpless scum bags will attack you, as UBL did when we looked weak and helpless thanks to Team Clinton!
When you look confident and strong you are less likely to be attacked.
By stripping the military, including Health Care, Clinton made us look weak and invited war into the United States.
War and lack of health care, the Liberal Democratic Solution!
PS: Did anyone realize that Congress wrote a Bill to cover poor people that covered people up to 300% of poverty level?
But, when they talk about Taxation the "Upper middle class" it is families making over "$50,000". Pretty scummy to put families of 4 making over 50K in both the "Poor" and the "Middle Class".
The first step should be legally defining the economic classes that politicians are discussing with real standards. Once Congress can universally define the economic strata in the United States the Bill will be much easier to pass.
Until then, VETO!
2007-10-06 01:49:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
War is ever with us. No matter who's in charge the Islamo Fascists have war going on all over this planet.
Health care should one of the primary concerns of all parents.
If they cannot provide proper health care for their children, then it is irresponsible to have children in the first place. It's like the woman who barely makes enough money to live and is single.
And when no one want to marry her she goes and gets pregnant by artificial insemination because she says she need a baby so she won't be alone.
Totally irresponsible.
The purpose of government is the defense of the nation from enemies both foreign and domestic. Health care although vitally important to all citizens is far from top of the list of the governments priorities.
I Cr 13;8a
2007-10-06 21:10:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No.
Regretably, war was the solution for a dictator who invaded his neighbors twice, refused to live up to the terms of a peace treaty he signed, would not let us know if he was developing WMD's, and ignored multiple UN resolutions.
Last time I checked, the majority of American children do have health care. If you are referring to the SCHIP issue that Bush did not sign, he did not say that children shouldn't have health care. He argued that the bill expanded coverage to those who could basically afford health care on their own, thus violating the intention of the program.
Please get your facts straight before posting.
2007-10-06 07:44:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by Pythagoras 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Considering there is no overpopulation problem, the question seems rather moot.
Wars are fought for survival. They are a necessary evil.
Adults from 18-25 are not children. Why should we allow Democrats give them health insurance and pretend to be doing it "for the kids". They are adults. Let them learn to take care of themselves.
Atleast with wars and lack of health insurance, people have a chance to survive. Children killed in abortion never have that chance.
2007-10-06 07:41:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by Avatar_defender_of_the_light 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
Defending the sovereignty of our country will always be the first priority of the government. Paying for the health care of 25 year olds and kids from families making $80,000 is not.
2007-10-06 09:48:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by kathy_is_a_nurse 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am sooo tired of you libs and your whining about health care!
Its not the governments responsibility to insure yalls lazy, sorry asses!
Government support in any form should be only temporary in times of hardship or life changing events!
My taxes should NEVER go to the life time support of an American citizen who is able to work! PERIOD!
Welfare, SCHIP, food stamps, already suck our nation dry!
You whining libs scream about Bush and his war, the money we spend on it, blah, blah, blah!
The war will one day be over! But the hand outs from our government will still continue to the poverty supported LIBS!
Over population? Lets see Hillary's answer to that was lets GIVE $5000.00 more dollars for every baby born! WTF?!!!!
Bushes answer was $1000.00 child tax credit!!! WOW!
That's a tax break for the WORKING American!
SHUT UP! QUIT WHINING! and get a JOB!
2007-10-06 08:52:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by Cajun_Hunter67 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sadly people think Bush is a failure, his friends think he's doing a great job.
He thinks it's working very well, clears out the poor. The poor can be replaced by Illegals who work cheaper, and can't complain.
Almost as good as the good old days of slavery
Around the world he has Muslims killing Muslims, and Israel safer than ever, with a spin machine working overtime
2007-10-06 07:35:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
It seems that it is the Democrats who want the tax surcharge to pay for this war and this impossible, unrealistic children's healthcare scheme. You have bought into the GOP war monger, kid-hating myth.
2007-10-06 09:13:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by Truth B. Told ITS THE ECONOMY STUPID 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
There is no lack of health care for American children, it's all propaganda and some morons suck it up.
2007-10-06 07:41:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Wow FDR killed off over 400,000 in four years Bush can only get 3,500 in 6! Stop asking fools questions.
2007-10-06 07:28:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by ThorGirl 4
·
2⤊
2⤋