I want to know for sure what cause the Fault Tree Analysis to be methodologically deficient. Is it the problem with the Fault Tree Analysis itself? Please I want objective( something that is proof to be the truth) points not subjective(something that you make judgement on using your educational experience which is not true it is just your assumption that you assume to be true)
2007-10-04 16:41:41 · 2 answers · asked by ryanchange_555102 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
All methodological attempts to prove "truth" are insufficient. Basically, it's because we haven't gotten to the bottom (yet) of the big philosophical questions.
2007-10-08 15:59:58 · answer #1 · answered by M O R P H E U S 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm not a horticulturalist, but I'm going to go out on a limb and say its because they start off with the wrong type of tree.
2007-10-06 16:09:27 · answer #2 · answered by two11ll 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋