English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What was the triumphent gleam in Dumbledores eye about on page 696? I have read the series over an over and i still cant figure it out!!!

2007-10-04 16:30:46 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities Books & Authors

7 answers

Dumbledore knows that by using Harry's blood he makes it so that the bond between them is two fold. First is that Voldemort attached part of his soul to harry when he killed him. And second was that when he took harrys blood into his body he made the charm his mother gave him make the bond twice as strong. and he knows that now Voldemort can't kill harry because the bond is just to strong now.

2007-10-04 18:14:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

fairly some those have been replied, before, yet to make sparkling for a collection of folk who look uncertain, and to offer the hardship-loose solutions for others: The locked room (i assume) refers back to the locked door interior the dept of Mysteries, the room wherein exists the skill Harry has in abundance (Allegedly, Love). Harry is neither on the subject remember of Voldemort or Dumbledore. If he became on the subject remember of Dumbledore, he would not have been with the Dursleys - they are his in uncomplicated terms kinfolk individuals. Voldemort is the final inheritor of Salazar Slytherin, so won't be able to be on the subject remember of Harry the two. i do no longer assume Tonks/Lupin to marry - there is already a marriage in Deathly Hallows, and that i doubt JKR will write 2 in a single e book the place there is plenty floor to conceal already. Harry would not would desire to die to kill Voldemort. The prophecy would not state that, it says the two would desire to die on the hand of the different. It would not, although, say he won't the two. James and Lily's wealth is composed of the gathered Potter funds - as an previous pureblood kinfolk, they have been nicely off. The 'horrific boy' in OOTP became James. Regulus tried to head away the death Eaters because of the fact he became afraid of what he became being asked to do and needed out. maximum in all probability guy or woman to help Regulus previous the horcrux protections could be Kreacher - additionally explains why he's nuts. in accordance to how the Fidelius works, Hagrid would desire to have hardship-loose already the place the Potters have been hiding with the intention to retrieve toddler Harry. Wormtail would have provided the Potters with a bite of paper with the secret written on it so as that they'd show human beings they depended on. in accordance to HBP, bill is purely no longer an entire werewolf in spite of the shown fact that it would not say he won't go through some outcomes on the factor of the comprehensive moon. Neville and Luna won't hook up - says so on JKR's website. i might like to know: After the blood ritual for Voldemort's resurrection, shouldn't the blood wards at Privetpersistent be ineffective if Voldy has Harry's blood in his veins? if so, why does Dumbledore deliver him returned there? in case you examine the prophecy with the word "Neville Longbottom is the different" in ideas, does it exchange all your expectancies?

2016-12-28 15:26:31 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I think it was covered (sort of) in the chapter in the last book when Harry and Dumbledore talked while Harry was knocked out in the forest. Because Voldemort took Harry's blood, he had Harry in him, and as long as he lived, Harry lived. Something like that. I thnk. The chapter's called 'kings cross station' I think. Lots of stuff was cleared up there. I still don't know what that baby was about though . . . .

2007-10-04 16:39:58 · answer #3 · answered by crazyallie 3 · 5 0

No one knew the answer to this until the last book came out. Read the part where Harry gets knocked out in the forest, will explain everything.

2007-10-05 16:16:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

like the first person said...she got it right!!

2007-10-05 12:02:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

crazyallie has got it right

2007-10-04 17:45:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

err....

2007-10-05 05:53:50 · answer #7 · answered by Albus Percival Wulfric Brian Dumbledore™ 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers