English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-10-04 16:22:10 · 9 answers · asked by Help needed 1 in Arts & Humanities History

9 answers

It depends on the time and the place. In India, for example, the English initially integrated quite well with the locals, or at least the upper class locals. Many adopted Indian dress and married Indian wives. Some even converted to Islam. That started to change in the 19th Century, and certainly changed for the worse after the First Patriotic War (or Indian Mutiny).

In Africa the locals were treated as 2nd class citizens, but the colonisation of Africa only really started in the 19th Century, so whatever shift in society caused the change in India would also affect relations with Africans..

In Australia they had nothing to do with the long term locals.

2007-10-04 16:49:34 · answer #1 · answered by iansand 7 · 0 0

The English traded amongst them.. tried to enforce their culture on them (which didin't work.. and has not at that time yet, before.. i.e. northern Ireland).

The majority of the English had a strong prejudice against the Native Americans. Majority of the English just weren't as tolerant as the French were towards the Natives.

2007-10-04 16:39:54 · answer #2 · answered by afromatic75 2 · 0 0

Which natives would that be? The colonized so many different places the sun never sat on their empire. In general, they moved in, took control (usually by force) and treated the native peoples as second class citizens. For more details, you would have to specify which natives you are interested in, such as the native peoples of India, New Guinea, Australia, etc.

2007-10-04 16:28:45 · answer #3 · answered by kcpaull 5 · 0 0

depends on what area of north america. All interactions were a little different.

2007-10-04 16:25:50 · answer #4 · answered by Mr M 3 · 0 0

specific, English is an exceedingly complicated language to understand, or maybe with in case you do it does not assure that the guy you're conversing with, exceedingly conversing, will understand what you're saying. the subject is that English is a lots extra effective helpful language in terms of the type of words we've than Portuguese, or French, working occasion. it fairly is the 2d-suitable language, after Arabic -- and in spite of the fact that i do now no longer talk it, I doubt Arabic has our continually-changing and increasing vocabulary. regrettably, the time-venerated American has a useful vocabulary of in basic terms approximately 500 words. Even the government estimates that 20% of community-English-conversing human beings won't have the potential to analyze and fully understand a newspaper. So in case you do attempt to specific your self fluently, distinctive individual will replace into bored or consistent with probability think of of you're in basic terms attempting to teach off, even with if English is your first language. in assessment to French, the region the juxtapositon of diverse words promises words precise meanings, in English which includes adjectives in basic terms promises to the confusion. Take some thing concern-unfastened like "i understand you very lots", working occasion. In French, some thing extra to "i understand you" lowers the fee. "i understand you very lots" skill "i understand you, yet i'm by no skill in love with you." In English, in case you're announcing "i understand you very lots" it ought to propose extraordinarily plenty some thing. If it fairly is any convenience, this "availability of precision" makes English a surprising motorcar for writing, lots extra effective helpful than optimal distinctive languages. it fairly is form of a surprising race-motorcar, or a complex laptop -- you specific extra effective helpful understand how topersistent it! there is the type of wealth of words and invention that could possibly be carried out. seem at rap song, working occasion -- at it fairly is optimal appropriate it fairly is very astonishing and owes lots to the rubbery way that we are able to place words at the same time and have them understood. and of direction the genuine masters like Shakespeare are in a league of their very very own -- becoming to be some thing never duplicated in any tongue i understand of. For clever purposes, you will in all probability attempt observing a some writers who've made their popularity by utilising concern-unfastened English to specific themselves (Ernest Hemingway in specific is composed of innovations) -- and emulate them. short sentences. those help lots.

2016-10-10 08:18:11 · answer #5 · answered by sutliff 4 · 0 0

They interacted with us with weapons of mass destruction.

2007-10-05 05:26:55 · answer #6 · answered by Darth Scandalous 7 · 0 1

which natives

2007-10-08 16:33:26 · answer #7 · answered by K M 4 · 0 0

evidently pretty good. They ate a big dinner, and sat down together and smoked a "peace pipe" !

2007-10-04 16:26:26 · answer #8 · answered by Scorpius59 7 · 0 1

They shot them.

2007-10-04 16:30:02 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers