2007-10-04 16:08:48 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
I would much rather see someone spontaneously combust. More fun to watch.
2007-10-04 16:15:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you're asking me if I'd rather see George Bush and Cheney "instantaneously vaporize or spontaneously combust"...........then I'd have to say I'd be happy either way.
2016-05-21 03:46:23 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both sound terrible!
Vaporize?
Correct combust means to catch on fire?
2007-10-04 16:18:03 · answer #3 · answered by Viola G. 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Instantaneously vaporize, less mess to clear up
2007-10-04 16:12:10 · answer #4 · answered by throw_away_your_television_2 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Combust, sounds mighty tempting to wish on someone who has done me terribly wrong. And while on the subject, it is also the one I would pick; since I won't have to clean up after (the sucker).
2007-10-05 12:23:15 · answer #5 · answered by sandrota 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Vaporize--cuz combustion would stink!!!
2007-10-04 16:17:58 · answer #6 · answered by angel_nurse82 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
vaporize.....I think the whole combustion thing is way too messy
2007-10-04 16:12:36 · answer #7 · answered by *♥* ♥* FaeGoddess*♥*♥* 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
given the choice between the two, and of course, that is fallacy, but hey, logical arugment... *cough*
well, and if I had to choose one, it'd be vaporization, because you can't feel it.
2007-10-04 16:12:55 · answer #8 · answered by The greatest and the best. 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
combustion
2007-10-04 16:12:02 · answer #9 · answered by midley m 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Vaporize ....because it would hurt less.
2007-10-04 16:12:53 · answer #10 · answered by Ronatnyu 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋