English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

"That [the Separate Car Act] does not conflict with the Thirteenth Amendment, which abolished slavery...is too clear for argument...A statute which implies merely a legal distinction between the white and colored races -- a distinction which is founded in the color of the two races, and which must always exist so long as white men are distinguished from the other race by color -- has no tendency to destroy the legal equality of the two races...The object of the [Fourteenth A]mendment was undoubtedly to enforce the absolute equality of the two races before the law, but in the nature of things it could not have been intended to abolish distinctions based upon color, or to enforce social, as distinguished from political equality, or a commingling of the two races upon terms unsatisfactory to either." [5]
The lone dissenter, Justice John Harlan, showed incredible foresight when he wrote

"Our Constitution is color-blind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens. In respect of civil rights, all citizens are equal before the law...In my opinion, the judgment this day rendered will, in time, prove to be quite as pernicious as the decision made by this tribunal in the Dred Scott case...The present decision, it may well be apprehended, will not only stimulate aggressions, more or less brutal and irritating, upon the admitted rights of colored citizens, but will encourage the belief that it is possible, by means of state enactments, to defeat the beneficient purposes which the people of the United States had in view when they adopted the recent amendments of the Constitution." [6]
Over time, the words of Justice Harlan rang true. The Plessy decision set the precedent that "separate" facilities for blacks and whites were constitutional as long as they were "equal." The "separate but equal" doctrine was quickly extended to cover many areas of public life, such as restaurants, theaters, restrooms, and public schools. Not until 1954, in the equally important Brown v. Board of Education decision, would the "separate but equal" doctrine be struck down.

2007-10-04 15:42:24 · 4 answers · asked by danny f 1 in Education & Reference Homework Help

but i dont know how to start the essay

2007-10-04 15:51:07 · update #1

i have to state the main topics 2 quotes

2007-10-04 15:53:28 · update #2

4 answers

You have the information already. Put it into your own words.

2007-10-04 15:47:36 · answer #1 · answered by Frosty 7 · 0 0

You have the basic gist of it - just write it into your own words.

Here is a nice starting off sentence:

In the famous U.S. Supreme Court case Plessy v. Ferguson, the justices of the Supreme Court struck down Brown v. Board of Education's "separate but equal" decision and also ... etc...

I hope this can give you a nice jump start...

2007-10-04 16:25:04 · answer #2 · answered by Coco 4 · 0 0

Cheater! :P i don't comprehend it the two. :) Plessy v. Ferguson: Plessy challenged the Louisiana regulation via not likely to the returned of the prepare. to that end, the courtroom case. Ferguson gained, and the preferrred courtroom widespread the regulation of "separate yet equivalent" on trains. even with the shown fact that it went to faculties too. yah i comprehend this essay isn't elementary. CBA sucks. :(

2016-11-07 07:25:33 · answer #3 · answered by slayden 4 · 0 0

Here is an article that could help you.This is about how to analyze case law. It may give you an idea or two.

http://law.slu.edu/academic_support/irac.html

2007-10-04 20:47:03 · answer #4 · answered by Toodeemo 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers