B) Wearing his pants around his ankles? Last butt not pervese C) Allowing Osama Bin Laden and his Al Qaida Terrorist Network to plan the mass murder attacks on Sept 11, 2001?.
2007-10-04 15:15:58 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
There was never a Federal Budget Surplus under Clinton. It was another lie - just like the lie about all the income producing Assets that ENRON had to offer under Clinton.
2007-10-04 16:04:52 · update #1
Let me see....
A, B & C.
And that is my final answer.
Good post as a friendly reminder.
2007-10-04 16:14:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Wow,, what a great history lesson. Here is at least one thing you missed. Clinton and his policies did help to stop the Millenium attack. He held meetings daily on the subject when the threats started to come up.
And when warnings for a 9/11 started to pop up, how many meetings were held by Bush. none. So when you want to lay blame on a terrorist attack on someone who had not been in power for what 7 months. Do it to someone that did not help prevent an attack when he was in power.
And how many innocents have Bush killed in Iraq.
Ignorance,,, it is a sad sad thing.
2007-10-05 02:05:03 · answer #2 · answered by empd 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
D) The longest period of economic expansion in the history of the country, preventing genocide in the Balkans, ensuring that those responsible for every terrorist attack on the US in his term (including the two committed by right wing american conservatives) are either dead or in jail now (the exception being the 2000 bombing - why did Bush decide not to keep this exemplary record going?).
2007-10-04 23:08:25 · answer #3 · answered by Sageandscholar 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
I find it strangely ironic that so many on the right can accuse left-wingers of irrationally hating Bush and yet can be utterly blind to the same sort of seething, unreasoned hate of Bill Clinton.
It does sort of rob conservatives of the moral high ground. But that's alright. Continue to fan the fires of division, hatred, and intolerance. Those are all fine American political traditions.
Cheers.
2007-10-04 23:21:04 · answer #4 · answered by blueevent47 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Right on! He sure did all those things. And, is no better than GWB. Leaving us to ponder why bring him back through his wife. Won't do it. It would be suicide, as the third time is a charm. We will all go up in smoke. With Rodham, we will need to dig a hole and hope the bomb doesn't get us, the few that will be left on the planet.
2007-10-04 22:51:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
D. As one of the top 5 Presidents in history; As rated by his fellow Americans.
And with 8 years of peace and much prosperity to his credit; Deservedly so.
Thanks for playing.
2007-10-05 00:26:50 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
None.
How about catching and imprisoning the perpetrators of the Trade Center bombings.
Unlike President Bush with his buddy OBL.
2007-10-05 02:16:00 · answer #7 · answered by Think 1st 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
D) Leaving Bu$hitler with a surplus, which Dumbo soon turned into a record deficit.
2007-10-04 22:54:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Innocent Serbians ? You forget it where the term "ethnic cleansing {genocide}" came from.
Slick Willy has his "legacy" carved in stone already...as a President as inept as Carter, dumb enough to let his wife try and make policy like FDR, and as big a lech as Teddy Kennedy.
2007-10-04 23:08:16 · answer #9 · answered by commanderbuck383 5 · 2⤊ 4⤋
All of the above.
2007-10-05 12:00:52 · answer #10 · answered by Steel Rain 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋