English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The charter of the UNO was drafted and approved when WWII was coming to the end. Then, USA, UK,France. Soviet Union and China were deemed "The Big Five."
Now that the imperialist powers of UK and
France have changed considerably, Soviet Union has gone out of World map,and the membership of UN has crossed 200 mark,
there is a compelling need to redraft the charter to ensure proper regional representation in the matter of "permanent membership in the Security Council" and abolition of the Veto!

2007-10-04 13:45:30 · 7 answers · asked by The Tribune 5 in Politics & Government International Organizations

7 answers

Yes the Charter needs amending. But, the amendment I would like to see concerns the response the organization should take whenever its peacekeepers are fired upon or otherwise menaced. Each UN Security Resolution that would authorize a peacekeeping mission under Chapter Six of the Charter would contain some warning phrases in it. To wit, if the peacekeeping mission is fired on or menaced in its mission, then it will automatically rise to the level of a peace enforcement mission under Chapter Seven of the Charter, with the mission commander having authority to use all means at his disposal to restore the peace.

2007-10-04 15:19:15 · answer #1 · answered by desertviking_00 7 · 0 0

The UN as it is today,is an impotent body
dancing to the tunes of the "Vetoing Five".Not only does it need a thorough overhaul but it
needs to show a little backbone.But then all the disquisitions we may have over the question you have posed,will just remain so with no one
concretising any worthwhile and gutsy proposals to make it a body to be reckoned with.

2007-10-04 14:16:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The U.N. needs to clean its own house before it does any kind of changes to its charter. It is a corrupt organization that in recent years has bordered on meaningless.

2007-10-04 13:53:30 · answer #3 · answered by rduke88 4 · 0 0

needless to say the finished moderation device is in prefer of a re-artwork or overhaul on the Yahoo! solutions/Yahoo Platform. so some distance as moderation, some categories deserve extra interest than others, via the two volume, debatable subject concerns, or historic previous of typical abuse or abusers. unusual, via fact it form of feels the moderation in Yahoo! communities works high-quality. diverse money owed are a perplexing component via fact you may continually declare the different account as an important different, relative or pal whilst relatively it fairly is not. Given the technologies of a multi-billion employer it relatively is incredible those sort questions even must be asked, actually it fairly is not innovations surgical technique for technologies giants to make your innovations up themselves. :-)

2016-10-10 08:07:56 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Only thing the UN needs is to be dismantled.

2007-10-04 16:30:45 · answer #5 · answered by archkarat 4 · 0 0

Agreed, not only is it outdated but horribly corrupt.

2007-10-05 14:27:53 · answer #6 · answered by Yahoo Sucks 5 · 0 0

No, I disagree with your statement.

2007-10-07 17:04:53 · answer #7 · answered by AO099 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers