A strong 3rd party would be great. However I think it would take a long time to catch on. Right now a third party wouldn't have the strength to win. But I think it is possible in the future.
2007-10-04 12:58:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by Sweet Tea & Lemons 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
I left the Democratic party back in 2000 and have never looked back. I registered Green. Let me say, however, that I don't agree with a lot of what the Green Party proposes, although among the two major third parties (the Greens and the Libertarians), I agree with the Greens more.
The reason I left the Dems--and had I been a Rep, too, I would have reasoned the same way--is the level of corruption and dysfunctionality that characterizes the major parties. They have a lock on power, not only terms of holding office, but also in the way in which they control access to voters who might not wish to be a part of our one and a half party system.
I will mention just a few things: Dems and Reps lead voting drives, they often freeze out viable third party candidates from public debates, they effectively keep many third party candidates off of state ballots in national elections.
One of the most important ballot initiatives in years was passed in California in 2002, where voters overwhelmingly voted for open voting in the primaries: any registered voter could ask for any party's ballot (e.g., a Libertarian could ask for the Republican ballot). This was a good victory for voters, and especially independent voters. Both the state Democratic and Republican Parties joined forces to have the initiative struck down.
Let me also say that I don't feel the need to vote a straight ticket--I have voted for Greens, Democrats, and even--once in a great while--a Republican. But on principle, I will never belong to either major party again. As they function in the United States, they erode democracy.
2007-10-04 12:51:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by blueevent47 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
the largest group is "independent" - neither rabid dem nor rabid rep. The general election is where the vote for the best candidate should be cast. Political parties and the two party system is a farse. How can a decision be made every 4 years that is good for half the people and bad for the other half of the people? Exhume G Washington, take a hair, and clone him, and turn it loose to kick some tail. G Wash said parties were bad bad bad and would be the undoing of us.
2007-10-04 12:42:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by Steve P 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
I can definetly see your point. I wish the libertarian party were stronger! I think that people get so bombarded with being either one or the other, and it also leads to stereotypes. If a person is this or that party, then he/she is either this way or that way, which is really kind of crazy if you think about it! I think that there should be a stronger libertarian party, with more self-accountability and less government control. If more people would vote libertarian, then the party would grow stronger. More people are going to have to just stop falling into the masses of one party or the other though, and put their vote in this party. Just because the two parties are the most popular with the most money doesn't mean they're the best ones quality-wise.
2007-10-04 12:53:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by questions 2
·
0⤊
3⤋
No it fairly is not throwing away your vote. extra human beings could desire to vote third occasion via fact the different 2 are continually battling and attacking decrease backward and forward. enable's see what the third occasion can do. i will understand what the 1st lady is making an attempt to declare, the dems and reps have plenty effect over the country so till that adjustments, it is going to look like balloting for the third occasion is counting your self out (it no longer even with the undeniable fact that) human beings say they like replace yet vote for a similar type many times.
2016-10-10 08:02:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because of my occupation, I cannot get involved in politics...can't join a party and can't contribute to parties. I am registered unaffiliated.
It is very possible that a third party could grow strong. If enough celebrities got together, and formed a party instead of going with Democrats the way a lot of them always do, they would be instantly popular. The celebrities would have a very hot party.
2007-10-04 12:40:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
This is the BIGGEST thing I don't get about the American political system - WHY do people JOIN the party that they are going to vote for?!?!?!?
Doesn't that tell the party how many people (in which states) are going to vote for them - BEFORE the election even happens?
If they EVER had a 100% voter turn-out, the winner would be known BEFORE THE POLLS CLOSED!!!
People should be FREE to vote for WHOEVER they want to - if the Republicans are REALLY screwing things up, then you SHOULD be able to vote Democrat JUST to show that you are sick of their crap!
THAT is how the "land of the FREE" should vote ;);););)
2007-10-04 12:47:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by kr_toronto 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
We should abolish political parties completely. No one person completely fits into either category. So why have the categories, or create new ones, in the first place?
2007-10-04 12:39:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by Katy 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
I just don't think that it matters. Because eventually the lobbyists and power corrupt them. I think term limits are needed more. I would give senators one term because 12 years is too long, and 3 terms for representatives to match senators.
2007-10-04 12:41:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by x2000 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Only if it sticks to traditional moral family values. If they don't pander to special interest groups with big bank accounts, then sure. Until then, I will stay with the Republicans.
2007-10-04 12:44:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by Huevos Rancheros 6
·
2⤊
1⤋