English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Do you think that Hillary will try to clean up the mess her husband created while he was in office? Or, do you remember the messes he created? They are all in the archives and our history, that of which they both are trying to hide.

2007-10-04 11:36:54 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Elections

17 answers

No, I don't think Bill Clinton was a tyrant while in office! He didn't think up NAFTA because even if he was smart enough he didn't have time. His wife was evidently not taking care of him at home or he was going through a mid life crisis at the time he was president. So he spent a lot of his time chasing tail.
I think that Hillary will win the nomination!
But I agree with Lonewolf.
When the Cons start unloading the ammo, they have got, she is sunk!!!
I don't know why the Democrat's want her and her baggage. The Clinton baggage could cost their party the presidential election???
Some people think her past is not going to matter. That it means nothing. But in the general election it will mean everything!!!! What she has done in the past is the only way to judge what she will do in the future.
If she gets elected it will be because the voting public is uninformed. I don't think the republicans are going to miss the chance to inform them.
It will be fun to watch!!!

2007-10-04 13:37:48 · answer #1 · answered by Working Man 6 · 1 1

Actually Hillary can't , not really without an investigation into stock trading and the like. See, she was on the Board of Director's for Mexico Wal Mart as Clinton debated Bushes draft. She left shortly before he signed NAFTA. Campaign Ethics Committee forced the sale of a Blind trust initiated in 1987 that include Wal Mart and gas companies, drug companies and other conflicts of interest. Fortunately for them Bush has been too busy with a War to reform Capital Gains Taxes he let slide by so the Clinton's lost big but not grande.
There are vaults full of Clinton blunders all expected to come out just like a pandora's box. Media Matters is just the first.

Try why did Clinton continue to bomb Iraq, not declare a war, and thousands died? Why did Hilary have security information about WMD and then once removed(gimme a break they knew the inspectors timetables) ?? Some say Bill knew, yes, and so forth. Reminds me of the Cher song Gypsies, Tramps and Thieves. Just the title I would never insult Cher who got our brave soldier's helmet fittings to add to safety in roadside bombings impact. Something the good Senator refuses to back is funding to armor our troops. Go there lady!! Do your day job gosh darn it. Take 10 million from a Senate run donated by New Yorkers and add it to Presidential funds? That's whacked. It's in every news piece along with her 22/27 mil victory last quarter. You just need to read the whole thing.

He was a tyrant. Anyone who has done the research knows. Hidden truths. They are coming out. You can bet no one is going down easy here, except the Clinton's as they are an easy target. But have you ever experienced a cockroach problem in your house? Every spray known to man has no effect. hmmmm but some day !!! Thank you.

2007-10-04 12:28:14 · answer #2 · answered by Mele Kai 6 · 1 0

Unfortunately, I don't think any candidate will denounce NAFTA. Politicians are pushing for a world economy. You'll see them pushing for the Central American Free Trade Agreement next. As for Hillary, I think she was behind much of what Bill did. She'll be ten times worse than he ever was. This country desperately needs to abolish this two party system because with each passing day, the two sides become closer and this country grows further away from the Representative Republic it's supposed to be.

2007-10-04 11:44:45 · answer #3 · answered by Brendan F 2 · 3 0

Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich have both denounced NAFTA, but most of the so-called frontrunners run for their
life when NAFTA is brought up at a debate.

2007-10-04 14:31:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Clinton signed NAFTA. He didn't create it. That was a bipartisan effort. And Hillary, like all globalists will not fix it.

I think the blue dress has finally been cleaned, so that mess is gone.

2007-10-04 13:17:05 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Bill Clinton did not create NAFTA:

"NAFTA was initially pursued by conservative governments in the United States and Canada supportive of free trade, led by Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney, U.S. President George H. W. Bush, and the Mexican President Carlos Salinas de Gortari. The three countries signed NAFTA in December 1992, subject to ratification by the legislatures of the three countries. There was considerable opposition in all three countries, but in the United States it was able to secure passage after Bill Clinton made its passage a major legislative initiative in 1993. During his presidential campaign he had promised to review the agreement, which he considered inadequate. Since the agreement had been signed by Bush under his fast-track prerogative, Clinton did not alter the original agreement, but complemented it with the aforementioned NAAEC and NAALC. After intense political debate and the negotiation of these side agreements, the U.S. House passed NAFTA by 234-200 (132 Republicans and 102 Democrats voting in favor, 156 Democrats, 43 Republicans, and 1 independent against).[4] and the U.S. Senate passed it by 61-38[5]"

2007-10-04 11:41:12 · answer #6 · answered by davidmi711 7 · 3 1

NAFTA was signed by the first president Bush. Republicans seem to like to forget that little detail.

The so called messes you are referring are the mythology created by the right about the Clinton's before, during and after his term in office. If you want proof, I refer you back to your original assertion that Clinton had created NAFTA.

2007-10-04 11:56:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

RE: was or was not Bill Clinton a good President? Was or was not Bill Clinton a Good President? not talking about the personal life drama. Did he or did he not accomplish whatever he said he was gonna do if he become President. If he Did do. What makes you guys think that Hillary will not do what she said she'll do? Does it make since?

2016-05-21 01:19:53 · answer #8 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

All baloney claims. Clinton was famous womanizer. Tyrant? Bush should claim the trophy if the two compete.

Clinton created messes in WH? Compare to Bush it is pale.

In Clinton era, America prosperity was truly based on people innovative and technology.
In Bush era, war economy and fear mongering are the prime source of economy growth.

2007-10-04 11:45:15 · answer #9 · answered by jean l 3 · 0 1

They may talk bad about NAFTA, but NONE of them will try to repeal it. Some would argue that Hillary is getting ready for her third term as president. She is more man than Bill.

2007-10-04 11:41:01 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers