Why are liberals so against the right to beer arms?

Question

never ceases to amaze me, neither does the way that liberals have absolutely no patients in fighting the war on terror.

Answer 1

I realize it was a typo, but I can get behind a bill to beer arms.

Anyway, liberals have a tendency to look at the world as it 'should' be.
People should use words, not fists
People should work for the common good
People should help out the needy, and share their good fortune.

Whereas, conservatives have a tendency to look at the world as is really is:
Words only work when the other party is willing to listen.
People will work to support those they are closest to, not the common folks
Charity has a tendency to create welfare states where people expect handouts if they are watched after.

When it comes to gun control, well the liberals once again look at the world as it "should be" If we get rid of guns, no one will be able to have them, therefore peace will prevail. Conservatives realize that criminals will always get guns, no matter what the legal system says.

Answer 2

I would suggest using your spell check. I don't know what a beer arm is. Anyway, only some liberals are against the 2ND amendment, not all. I have patience in fighting the war on terror but not getting troops killed to prop up a government that will never last.

Answer 3

Liberals tend to be knee-jerk reactors, which means they will look at the symptoms rather than the problem as a whole. They would rather do the quick and obivous thing, which is to take the guns away, than look at the reasons why violence occurs. Guns make it easier for violent offenders to carry out their b.s., so the liberals say take 'em away.

Perhaps they're afraid that if they look deeper, they'll find that their entitlement philosophy is one of the reasons people get angry and frustrated enough to take up arms for the wrong reasons. Here's one example of what I mean:

Every time the left raises the minimum wage, which is intended to help minimum wage earners, simple economics dicates that prices of everything must go up so that the business owners will make enough money to pay for the increase in their employees' wages. Now, minimum wage earners may make more money, but the cost of everything goes up at a disproportionate rate, so they are actually paying a higher percentage of their income for everything than they were before. This widens the gap between the haves and have-nots, which causes more crime and thus, more gun use. And the liberals want to fix this by taking the guns away.

Do you see how sick this is?

Answer 4

I believe you mean "bear" arm and "patience" rather than patience.

Anyway, I'm a liberal and I don't have a problem with gun rights, although I believe there should be limits. I don't believe individuals should be able to own nuclear weapons or other weapons of mass destruction. Do you? If you don't, then you also are in favor of limits on personal armaments and the issue boils down to where each individual draws the line.

The framers of the Constitution weren't thinking ahead to a time when there were automatic weapons, grenade launchers, armor piercing bullets, etc. Essentially they were thinking flintlock rifles.

So, as a society we need to agree on where the line should be drawn.

Answer 5

A good beer arm sounds alright to me. It really comes in handy after a day of rabbit hunting.

Answer 6

I think you meant,"bear arms," bud...

And I'm not opposed to it.

If it gives you a warm, fuzzy feeling of security to have some heavy ordnance in the house or on your hip, have at it.

Me, I dont' need it.

But, whatever makes you feel good...

Answer 7

Co's drinking and fighting don't go together, which hospital did the patients come from?

Answer 8

How many guns do you own? Personally, I only want one more, a Smith&Wesson MP15T, but I have serious doubts about the governor of my state allowing me to have one.
That is why I'll soon be moving to a state where I can buy them off garage sale tables with ammo, ready to go.
So your little fable isn't as accurate as you would like to pretend.

What do all you people worry about this for, when you submit to everything a neocon government wishes, and consider it treachery to disagree with your king, I have no clue.
What do you need a gun for, when silencing dissent, and submitting is your way of life?
If you haven't noticed, it is your type, that wants the government to be able to spy on anyone and everyone who owns something they feel is a threat, whether the person is or isn't a threat.
remember what your type claims... if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear....and if you have nothing to fear, why do you need a weapon??

you people are like mechanics that think the tools are going to fix the cars all by themselves.

Answer 9

Socialists prefer unarmed peasants..

Answer 10

I love a girl that has strong "beer arms" the kind that can hold many beers at once.