I think not. Bush only supports the soldiers if they are in working order, not after they are wounded.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/17/AR2007021701172_2.html
He has the power to get Walter Reed where it should be and he hasn't done it.
Rodents? Mold?
This is a horrible way to care for the wounded soldiers and it clearly shows his lack of human interest.
"President Bush, former defense secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and members of Congress have promised the best care during their regular visits to the hospital's spit-polished amputee unit, Ward 57."
Has any type of improvement been made for them?
2007-10-04 10:47:01 · 5 answers · asked by MadLibs 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
See what happens when we rob government agencies that do good things to fund a damn war and so we can brag we didn't raise taxes to pay for the war. He has tried to drain every agency possible and borrowed beyond the limit for what? His damn stupid war, a war we started for no reason but a lust for oil and revenge. What a waste of money and human life.
2007-10-04 11:12:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
he is just about as loyal to our vets as he is to our country. instead of partying down and shirking his duties as he did during vietnam war he is ruining our country in other, more sinister ways
2007-10-04 18:02:44 · answer #2 · answered by ben j 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Do you really think that is all Bush's fault.
2007-10-04 17:55:53 · answer #3 · answered by TRS 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
This is government-run healthcare.
Let me guess, you would support socialized medicine, wouldn't you?
2007-10-04 18:01:36 · answer #4 · answered by hlkb72 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
"Mad" is a synomym for "insane."
2007-10-04 18:00:40 · answer #5 · answered by regerugged 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋