He wants me to help him find an apartment in vicinity. I hung up when he called and he called back leaving mess. If do not intend on talking to him,he wants all his stuff he did not want me to have. Which I donated the most of it to charity. Do to some of his past endeveor I am concerned about this. Legally can he do anything. Please someone let me know.
2007-10-04 09:41:03 · 12 answers · asked by t w 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
We need more facts: how long ago did your ex leave the property with you; what was stated by your boyfriend after he left, concerning the property; and what type of property was involved.
You have the defenses of gifting and abandonement.
!. Gift: If the items were given to you as a gift, then they are yours. If the items are very personal, i.e. a mink stole, then there may be a presumption that they were gifted. If it was a sofa, then it is less reasonable to presume it was a gift.
2. Abandonement: If your boyfriend left without stating when he was coming back; if your ex told you to hold on to the items, and he did not ask for them for a long period of time thereafter, you can assert the items were abandoned.
The court will look to the reasonableness of his actions and your actions.
Good luck!
2007-10-04 09:52:18 · answer #1 · answered by MenifeeManiac 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Legally it is his property and he can take you to small claims court. Depending on your laws and how long he left it there after the break up you may be in the clear. If he waited like more than three months to get his stuff then he was considered to have abonded his stuff.
In the future just give everything back.
2007-10-04 09:53:52 · answer #2 · answered by Big Daddy R 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If it was his stuff and you did not properly notify him to pick it up and give him the time allowed by law (30 days is pretty common) he could sue you for the cost of replacing the items.
You can not legally just throw out peoples things just because you no longer like them.
2007-10-04 09:44:48 · answer #3 · answered by davidmi711 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
you're contradicting the know God. For one, the know God says this " and the gospel would be preached to all international locations then the top will come. ". this suggests that there's no guy or woman who won't hear the gospel etc. If one dies earlier listening to the gospel, i might assume he's youthful and could be with the Lord. If no longer, then i'm going to assume he has heard the gospel on the grounds that that's what the bible says. The bible would be preached to every person. With the technologies of in the present day, that's impossible for all people to no longer hear the gospel. we've radio, television, and information superhighway. the warm button is God is attempting to get human beings to heaven. yet some human beings do no longer prefer to head. it is not that they like to head to hell. in uncomplicated terms an fool might actual prefer to head to hell. And in the event that they do say that, they had exchange their minds rapid. in actuality, human beings do exactly no longer prefer to head to heaven. they like to stay lifestyles on earth to the fullest and deny a Godly lifestyles. God won't purely say " hello come on visit heaven " one time. What did he do with the Israelites? what number prophets did he deliver to warn them of the appearance judgments in the event that they did no longer repent? what number warnings has he despatched them? you think of he won't do a similar for each individual with eternal hell hearth putting in the stability right here? every person would have a gamble to settle for the gospel or no longer. there'll be NO excuses earlier God. as nicely the excuse which you denied the actuality and you probably did no longer know. yet that excuse is refuted because of the fact God has made the actuality undeniable to every person. And all people who denies it is going in the present day to hell. i do no longer care once you're a freaking hermit, all have sinned. And all would be held responsible for their sins except they are washed away via the blood of the Lamb.
2016-12-28 14:55:14 · answer #4 · answered by cantara 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
David and susie are correct. By not notifying him to retrieve his belonging, or by accepting them, you created what in law is called a 'bailment'...an agreement to care for his belongings.
All you had to do to protect yourself is to write a certified (RRR) letter to him telling him to retrieve his belongings within 7 days (or a reasonable time) and failure to do so would be considered by you as permission to dispose of the items.
You did nothing and therefore, he can seek recovery for your actions in small claims court (if the value of the items fits your local laws) or in a higher court if the value of the items exceeds small claims limit.
2007-10-04 10:11:34 · answer #5 · answered by hexeliebe 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you did not object to him leaving those items at your home when he left them there, and you did not notify him to pick them up (and allow a reasonable amount of time to pick them up) - then yes he could have recourse against you.
2007-10-04 09:49:03 · answer #6 · answered by Susie D 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Depends on your local law. He will need reciepts for all of it to prove its worth. He must also have proof that he left you in charge of it with the intent to retrieve it later. I would not worry about it. You must be honest with him tho. YOu will need to tell him that you gave it away.
2007-10-04 09:46:08 · answer #7 · answered by bildymooner 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
He can try suing you in Small Claims court but he'd have to have proof that he asked you to take care of his stuff. He'd probably have a hard time winning his case.
2007-10-04 09:45:05 · answer #8 · answered by LIGirl 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
When a man is pissed he will do anything, so be carefull and put 911 on speed dial
2007-10-04 09:46:59 · answer #9 · answered by myself 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Nope! His Loss, your Gain!
2007-10-04 09:44:56 · answer #10 · answered by Jaime M 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋