English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

history?

sure, they've been foiled, but not because of the war. they've been foiled on the part of the FBI.

seems to me like the war is CAUSING terrorism

2007-10-04 09:15:05 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

15 answers

Before 9-11 we just thought this was a problem for other places and it wouldn't have made the news if it was stopped. Now that we have experienced terrorism it is a big deal.

2007-10-04 09:28:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Prior to the war, the terrorist attacks against Americans all over the globe are too numerous to list here. Neither we nor the war is "causing terrorism." If we leave a piece of fruit in the middle of the kitchen floor and tomorrow it's covered with cockroaches - believe me, we did not cause or create the cockroaches - they were there all along and we simply weren't looking for them.
Obviously, our policies of inaction and no effective response in the past did nothing to stem this ideology of hatred and blood lust or the terror attacks - but I never once saw a post that suggested these policies of allowing the terrorists to slaughter thousands of innocent people were causing terrorism. We cannot return to these policies with any dignity while innocent men, women and children fall victim to this vicious, religious fanaticism.
I'm damned proud that America and her true allies are finally confronting these murderers - they no longer can slaughter innocent people with impunity - there will be serious consequences, as there should be.

2007-10-04 10:04:12 · answer #2 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 1 1

Well we saw what happens when we sit back and do nothing like Clinton did when he had a chance to get bin Laden... we get attacked on 9/11.

I'll go with war is keeping us safe and not cowering in fear while cut and running.

One thing is clear... more terrorist have been killed than US troops. Once the terrorist are so afraid to cut and run, we will win.

That's how you win a war. When the loser gives up.

Seems like a lot of you guys never went to grade school. All kids knows what it takes to win.

Home schooled?

2007-10-07 08:06:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

you are able to not combat a conflict against terrorism. terrorism isn't a rustic. yet you are able to not create a talk with them the two, because of the fact those all of us is radicals. all i comprehend is that we could think of of a few thing devoid of postpone previously all is misplaced. and no mr. bush, the respond replaced into to not invade iraq(who replaced into not in touch in 9/11) and placed across terrorists to combat against us to that usa. i'm so bored with listening to approximately how lots of our infantrymen are killed there each and on a daily basis. the media desires to commence exhibiting photos & very own info on those infantrymen so as that they are not purely a # to the folk gazing. then people might actually comprehend what we are dropping right here. & somewhat push the government to locate the thank you to get us out of there. sorry, i did not advise to rant.

2016-10-06 02:43:35 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

you are absolutely right on this.
the reason that we are at war is because those with the connections can make a killing off of the business of war.
it was not fashionable to prosecute terrorism as a criminal act, no money in that,so you start a war and look tough while you denigrate your predecessors and rake in the cash with both hands

2007-10-04 09:39:01 · answer #5 · answered by Constipated CON. 7 · 2 1

War terrorizes people.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kcfkb_9txpI

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18483.htm

2007-10-04 12:24:41 · answer #6 · answered by belle 4 · 0 1

We can always count on "andy g" to deliver the typical NeoCon talking point response....In the process embarassing himself and the party for which he speaks.

This war is CAUSING terrorism, not solving it. So says me...AND THE BIPARTISAN 9-11 COMMISSION. ROFL at you mindless Cons...

2007-10-04 09:20:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

Makes you wonder why the FBI didn't stop 9/11.Especially since they had the 20th hijacker Moussaoui in custody for weeks before 9/11.

2007-10-04 09:22:08 · answer #8 · answered by honestamerican 7 · 4 2

the emperor wears no clothes . congratulations your eyes have opened . i wish every one else would wise up too . bush started an illegal war for oil . dems and repubs are both corrupt . lets all vote other .

2007-10-04 10:17:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Could please provide the number of terrorist plots planned before the war and the number of plots after the war started? These two numbers might be helpful to your arguement. If you do not have these then you have no arguement and are stritctly using liberal talking points.

2007-10-04 09:22:43 · answer #10 · answered by JonB 5 · 1 4

fedest.com, questions and answers