Got in an arguement the other day, who do you tihnk would come out on top and why?
2007-10-04 08:57:13 · 12 answers · asked by Chris S 2 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
cowboys take it down by quite a bit. they have a large advantage at most positions. i'll give denver a slight edge at QB. RB is all dallas i know davis was good but emmitt is one of the all time greats. WR dallas, TE dallas, and how about O line. that might have been the best offensive line EVER. plus you had haley, norton, woodson, deion, lett, maryland, and marion on D. '95 cowboys are talked about as one of the greatest teams of all time. '98 broncos were good but come on now.
2007-10-04 09:14:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
Cowboys, the broncos misplaced Cutler and now Orton is the commencing QB. that they had a bad protection final 365 days, and would actually have a bad protection this 365 days. they have no working game, yet have been given by ability of because of fact of their passing game final 365 days, in spite of the undeniable fact that Orton isn't any elite QB (Rex Grossman beat him out for the commencing job in Chicago multiple situations). Plus Marshall could no longer additionally be on the team. The Cowboys could be particularly good, great working game which will strengthen this 365 days if the two backs are healthful. Romo is a sturdy QB, and Witten is a great TE. good offensive line, and Roy Williams is asserted to be in great shape, and it would be his first comprehensive 365 days with the team.
2016-12-17 17:12:18 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is that a joke, the 98 Broncos weren't all that good and the 95 boys were dominant. If the Vikings wouldnt have choked in the NFC championship they would have beat the Broncos inthe 98 superbowl. They weren't as good as you think and the cowboys were amazing in the 90's.
2007-10-04 16:30:39 · answer #3 · answered by pando57078 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
95 cowboys. no question. the 96 packers would even beat the 98 broncos. these were the years the nfc truly dominated on all sides of the ball. 95 cowboys were a force to be reckoned with. i'm not saying the 98 broncos were a bad team, they just wouldnt beat the sterling offensive and defensive jaugernauts of the 95 cowboys. i hate the cowboys too, but i wouldnt forget the team they had. it was like, have fun trying to get throught that OL!
2007-10-04 09:08:39 · answer #4 · answered by The Claymaker- Go Pack! 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
The 1998 Broncos were one of the best all around teams in the last 20 years. The 1998 Denver Broncos would absolutely destroy the 1995 Cowpies.
2007-10-04 09:04:36 · answer #5 · answered by ndmagicman 7 · 1⤊ 5⤋
The 98 Broncos would take this one. They were a scoring machine. I remember their offense being referred to as a "ferrari".
Sure the NFC was dominant for several years before 98, but when Denver beat Green Bay in 97 the tides were turned and the AFC has dominated since then. Not that it matters, we're not comparing conferences here we're comparing teams.
It would probably be a shootout and end close, but Denver would have the edge. Remember, Davis ran for 2500+ yards that year (regular season + playoffs) and Elway couldn't be stopped by anyone.
GO BRONCOS!!
2007-10-04 09:29:37 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
Would be a good matchup, I honestly don't think either side would run away with that one. Whichever team happened to make the least mistakes would take it.
2007-10-04 10:58:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not even an arguement, The Cowboys would dominate.
2007-10-04 09:29:22 · answer #8 · answered by six_foot_2_midget 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Boys
2007-10-04 09:01:29 · answer #9 · answered by rikirailrd 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Cowboys!! Boys-D would spank around Elway and company.
2007-10-04 09:35:18 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋