2007-10-04 08:04:04 · 12 answers · asked by Page 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The Bush administration’s language of “preemptive strikes,” “regime
change,” and “anticipatory self-defense” is purely Orwellian, presenting euphemisms
for raw military aggression.
2007-10-04 08:04:39 · update #1
Just rovingly curious....
2007-10-04 08:05:29 · update #2
A global strategy based on the new Bush doctrine of preemption means the end of the system of international institutions, laws and norms that we have worked to build for more than half a century.
2007-10-04 08:20:29 · update #3
Then they don't have to justify their actions.
The damage is done, no one can sue, and those who try can be stopped by claiming "national security" or "executive privilege".
All crimes to my, and any thinking persons mind.
2007-10-04 08:10:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Our answers really don't matter to them. They have pushed Wilson's dream of a global democracy with the U.S. as its leader into a new era and clearly decided that a global dictatorship is close enough. Like any other dictator, they are prepared to use fear and force in order to control the masses.
They have proven that they don't care about freedom and democracy. They have proven it by the loss of liberties here at home. They have proven it by their willingness to overthrow democratically elected leaders in other nations, and they have proven it by their willingness to carry out a preemptive military invasion and occupation of another nation using lies as their justification for war.
2007-10-04 10:43:17 · answer #2 · answered by Guardian 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a million, 4 hundred thousand, fifty-seven......then he's immediately impeached.....for sure you may hire inner maximum companies to ask the questions approximately tape in boiler rooms 500 human beings at a time.....inspite of the shown fact that that's going to all be thoroughly documented with the help of a panel of Fox and friends....then bill O'Reilly will enable us to all understand...week after uninteresting week of irrational diatribe
2016-10-21 01:12:12 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Alcohol lowers inhibitions and creates a sense of invincibility. Coke is even worse.
2007-10-04 08:22:51 · answer #4 · answered by The President 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Becasue the alternative of striking after they take out an american city really stinks.
Which city are you willing to give up before you strike.
2007-10-04 08:13:16 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Best offense is a good defense Read a history book
2007-10-04 08:15:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
I have no idea,,,neocons seem to do things *** backwards.as for questions,,,they don,t like any questions...I will ask a few more,but none that have not been asked many times,with no good answers...chow supercutie,,,freepress
2007-10-04 08:21:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I like the "neolib" way, of getting hit, and then saying "Those that did this will be brought to justice. (Silence)
Getting Hit AGAIN. Say " Those that did this terrible act will be brought to justice" (crickets)
GET HIT AGAIN. Say " We will bring those that did this to justice." Find a cigar and a White House Intern.
I can see why that way is better!!!!!!
How are you?? I hope all is well with you and yours!!
2007-10-04 08:21:25 · answer #8 · answered by Supercell 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Bush and the neo-cons are incapable of thinking beyond 10:00 pm of any given day.
2007-10-04 08:07:37 · answer #9 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 6⤊ 4⤋
Well my question is why do liberal like to be attacked and then do NOTHING??? And then blame America for being attacked???
Now that is a question.
2007-10-04 08:19:03 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋