History and need help with finding the answer?

Question

the teacher said to compare the French, Spanish and English conquest and colonlization, but it's hard for me to distinquish each group of people from one another and write about it. please help

Answer 1

Did the teacher also say to ask your homework questions in the Homework Help category? If not, I will.

Answer 2

well here are the basic differences

-Spanish-

When they first came in contact with a new race of people they would fire a cannon at a nearby rock or tree to completly shatter it. They would then portray themselves as gods and take tribute from the people. When the people realized they were fooled the spanish would murder, rape, and enslave them. The spanish never intially sent settlers. They sent soldiers and the areas they took were considered military outpost.

-English-

The english would land near a native american settlement with the hope to trade with the native americans for food until they could grow there own. The english were happy to establish trade contracts with the native americans but still considered them a lesser people. In the beginning the english and native americans were cival with one another; however,disputes began after the english began to encroach upon the native americans land. The english would settle an area with families of men women and children

-French-

The french were the most peaceful out of the bunch. They would always bring gifts when establishing trade contracts and even on general visits. They still considered the natives a lesser people but it was also not uncommon to see a frenchmen and a native american women marry. The french also treated the native americans with more respect as a people, and wouldnt infringe upon territorial land as much. This is how the french established more native allies then britian in the coming wars. The initial french explorers were mainly male.

hope that helps

Answer 3

I would consider where they colonized and/or conquered, what sort of contacts they made with the locals (friendly, as in trade; or hostile as in invasion, for example; and don't forget the introduction of European religions as part of the contacts).
Is this only on the American continents or across the globe?

Focus on one aspect at a time--look at all English colonization in North America, for example. Make notes about who, where, why, & when. How developed were they and did the motherland support or interfere with the running of colonies?
I can guarantee you that all 3 countries had different motives, though some overlapped; they all wanted something different besides money/power.

Answer 4

you could start with the categories with which to compare and contrast the three colonizers. suggestions:
1.manner/means of conquest (was it bloody, peaceful, etc)
2.length of colonization
3. type of government/regime (democratic,dictatorship, etc)
4. rights and privileges available to citizents of the colony
5. lasting legacy to the society

Answer 5

Well heres a site you can go to for help. Its was giving to me just a few days ago and its was alot of help it is listed below.

Answer 6

I applaud your efforts at erudition. It could also be complicated to furnish a natural historical past due to the fact that such a lot of Christianity has much less to do with parties (instead of the seen ones) and extra to do with events, recommendations, summary ideas felt extra deeply within the center than might ever be placed to paper. Here are a few books I've determined to be independent (or no less than really so). You might desire to set apart a couple of months: "Early Christian Writings: The Apostolic Fathers" by means of A. Louth "The Early Church" by means of H. Chadwick "Origen: An exhortation to Martyrdom, Prayer, and decided on works" by means of R. A. Greer and H. U. Von Balthasar "The History of the Church: From Christ to Constantine" by means of Eusebius (4th century), translation A. Louth "The Orthodox Church within the Byzantine Empire" by means of J.Hussey "The New Concise History of the Crusades" by means of T. F. Madden "The Spanish Inquisition: A Historical Revision" by means of H. Kamen "The Reformation" by means of D. MacCulloch "The Ascent to Truth" by means of T. Merton "America's God" by means of M. A. Noll "Reclaiming the Great Tradition" by means of J. S. Cutsinger To present a "reasonable" stability, person who displays a probably extra antagonistic tone, I present the next: "A History of God" by means of K. Armstrong "The Jesus of History, the Christ of Faith" by means of J. R. Porter "Constantine's Sword" by means of J. Carroll Anything by means of Shelby Spong I'm now not keen on the above 4 due to the fact that I uncover them to be antagonistic in tone and incomplete in insurance policy, however they present an opposing standpoint.