I was at a BBQ last weekend and some republican supports were saying fox news owner was a big time democrat. They argued he has nothing to do with the republican party.
2007-10-04 05:08:50 · 15 answers · asked by john a 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
He's NWO actually - At this time that puts him more in line with the Republicans - He actually is regarded as one the main reasons that Thatcher got and then held on to power in Britain when he bought up some of the most important influential papers there.
He is also attributed with getting Blair into power who officially was Left wing being leader of the traditionally socialist Labour Party - but in truth Blair was a right winger too.
BTW he is now an American citizen -since you have to be to own a TV station in the US -probably the only reason he is!
He is for the party who delivers the goals of the NWO in any country -
2007-10-04 06:03:42 · answer #1 · answered by celvin 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Republican
2007-10-04 05:37:06 · answer #2 · answered by brainstorm 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
For one he's Australian, so neither.
Secondly he will support whomever will keep his coffers full. In Britain it was the Tory party so all of the newspapers that he owned were considerably right-wing in their stance. When the Labour party became "New" Labour and cosied up to big business, he became a little more friendly to them.
To be honest, he doesn't really care as he will aim at the lowest common denominator and pitch to them. These are the groups that prefer their politics in soundbites and knee-jerk reactions. Hence Fox News getting the high ratings in the US and The Sun newspaper being the biggest seller in the UK. That way he's guaranteed making a shed-load of cash.
2007-10-04 05:45:55 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Contrary to "redheads" assertion that FOX is republican, the fact that they report the news in an unslanted way would make it quite obvious that the owner's politics is irrelevant. If they were strictly from the right they would never let Alan Combs and Susan Estrich participate, nor would they invite liberals on their programs. "Fair & Balanced" would be a precarious position for the other networks to adopt, due the the fact that their viewers prefer to be spoonfed and not have to make decisions on their own. Her reply, however, is very revealing of her politics. She is a casual leftist, and therefore prefers to remain outside of informed political dialog. It's an intellectually lazy position, but typical. Those on the right are always equipped for debate because they are knowledgeable,
2007-10-04 05:35:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
He is his own party the Big Bucks Party, hes worked to have restrictions on his empire abandoned so he can control more of the news than was previously allowed, hes a scandalmonger and has no respect for our country or our system, but he loves our money.
Hes contributed to both parties, I honestly think he doesn't care who wins as long as he can do what he wants, I think hes at least fifty percent responsible for the divisiveness in American politics today.
2007-10-04 05:25:08 · answer #5 · answered by justa 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i've got have been given some piano twine that i might prefer to look after a loop around Rupert Murdochs balls and then drag him around by. previous rupert is a sparkling american and has no concept of why we've the rights we do. And yet yet another excuse to chop back immigration........
2016-10-10 07:25:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't believe he is Republican or Democrat....he is a pure capitalist with his only goal being to make as much money as he possibly can regardless of who it destroys...and if he has the chance to monopolize the market, that's the way he wants it.
2007-10-04 05:27:52 · answer #7 · answered by Becca 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
His name is Rupert and there is no evidence what so ever that he is a republican but spinning the lie works to advance the democrats narrow minded message
2007-10-04 05:19:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
He's clearly a republican. Faux news is so slanted that it's not even worthy of being considered as a news source. He probably gave to her campaign in order to curry favor with her, so that if she does get elected, he's hoping that she wouldn't prevent him from expanding his media empire by buying out competitors.
2007-10-04 05:22:21 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Fox News is very Republican in its outlook and comments.
The Republicans that I know like Fox news and watch it often
the Democrats that I kow dislike Fox News and will not watch it . I would rather watch grass grow than the news
2007-10-04 05:18:17 · answer #10 · answered by flautumn_redhead 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋