2007-10-04 04:50:14 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The plaintiff got the judgment against MSG. They have the deep pockets.
The doctrine of Respondeat Superior was used. The boss is responsible for what the employee does.
In this case management at MSG was held to be negligent because they became aware of the abuse and let it continue.
2007-10-04 04:58:21 · answer #1 · answered by regerugged 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The judgement stated that MSG fostered a hostile environment.
If they had handled the complaints against Thomas properly, they would not have to pay.
2007-10-04 11:54:45 · answer #2 · answered by alanastarkey 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Beats me. He should have paid the fine and fired from the job.
2007-10-04 11:54:12 · answer #3 · answered by BrushPicks 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because he works for them and they are the ones with the insurance!~!
2007-10-04 11:58:28 · answer #4 · answered by Hunter 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋