English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

After hearing the dispicable comments by Rush Limbaugh, regarding our nations heros,
I, _________________________________________________
am urging Congress to take action against such maliciousness,
that would need to be reaaranged before allowing our soldiers to hear such programming

This type of calisness only proves to demoralize our troops in theatre, and can never be tolerated.
Especially in the absence of an apology or a retraction

We are very proud of every soldier deployed, and to allow such comments to continue
would be a travesty to every soldiers moral who is kept in harms way.

2007-10-04 02:02:57 · 20 answers · asked by writersbIock2006 5 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

20 answers

When you watch the Rush Limbaugh phony drama unfold, you might be asking yourself: Who started this phony war over the phony issue of so-called "phony soldiers"?

The answer: Not Rush Limbaugh.

It was started by a guy named David Brock who runs the online organization you're heard a lot about lately, Media Matters for America. Brock is a onetime conservative who wrote a book about his transformation from Clinton-hating muckraking author to conservative-hating crusader and Hillary Clinton confidante. They talk often, according to reports. And she claims to have co-founded Media Matters. In this transformation, he also discovered his true self and came out as a gay man.

Brock became a kneecapper for Hillary Clinton and George Soros. He first took office space in the office of John Podesta, former Clinton chief of staff, who was running the Center for American Progress, a Soros-funded left-wing organization. Brock began attacking conservatives.

A telling observation of Brock's Media Matters Web site is that the one thing it does consistently day in and day out is attack anybody who disses Hillary.

Media Matters clearly works in concert with other Soros left-wing hit teams, like MoveOn.org. When MoveOn stepped on its own toes sliming Gen. Petraeus, Brock and Media Matters swung into action looking for a conservative who would say something that could take the focus off MoveOn.

Enter Rush Limbaugh and the "phony soldier" discussion. Understand, Media Matters was so anxious to get the stink off MoveOn they made up the Rush controversy.

Rush was talking about a real phony soldier, Jesse MacBeth, whose lies were exposed days earlier by ABC's Charlie Gibson and Brian Ross. No question he is a phony soldier and that is what Rush was talking about. No matter to Media Matters. It was enough to invent a lie.

David Brock is Media Matters, so in this case that particular lie is all his.

2007-10-04 03:14:00 · answer #1 · answered by ? 3 · 5 1

Here you go:

After hearing Liberal organizations lame attempts to link despicable comments to Rush Limbaugh regarding our nations heroes,
I, ______________________________...
am urging Congress to take action against such maliciousness, and for once pull their Democratic tails from between their legs and stand up for what is right. For once, Democrats should truly be supportive of our troops and not just play it up for some votes.

This type of callousness only proves to demoralize our troops in theater, and can never be tolerated. Especially in the absence of an apology or a retraction.

We are very proud of every soldier deployed, and to allow such comments to continue would be a travesty to every soldier's morale who is in harms way.

2007-10-04 02:19:36 · answer #2 · answered by Philip McCrevice 7 · 3 1

Sounds OK, but you need spell check.

This is a draft petition against Rush Limbaugh, what do you think? Help amend it?
After hearing the despicable comments by Rush Limbaugh, regarding our nations heroes,
I, ______________________________...
am urging Congress to take action against such maliciousness,
that would need to be rearranged before allowing our soldiers to hear such programming

This type of callousness only proves to demoralize our troops in theatre, and can never be tolerated.
Especially in the absence of an apology or a retraction

We are very proud of every soldier deployed, and to allow such comments to continue
would be a travesty to every soldiers moral who is kept in harms way.

.

2007-10-04 02:09:00 · answer #3 · answered by The Wiz 7 · 2 3

I usually don't answer these. I like reading through them, but I had to say something here. I know I'm going to offend some people, so I want to apologize now. I am a US Soldier. I fight for the U.S.A. and our constitution. I believe in free speech. I say leave him alone. First off, that isn't what he meant. Even if it was I may not agree with him, but I do what I can for him and what he says. Just like a few years ago with the Dixie Chicks. I just hope people with harsh views about the military remember where their free speech comes from and why they have it. Does that make any sense. I don't have to worry about anyone. I am very proud of my country, what I do and of course, what I've accomplished.

2007-10-04 05:34:51 · answer #4 · answered by Fendog 1 · 1 0

Hilarious. You Libs are simply hilarious. First of all you fell for the propaganda hook, line and sinker. Anyone who actually listened to the full transcript of what he said, and still believes he was referring to the military as a whole doesn't have enough intelligence to have this debate. Please be honest with yourself with what he said. He called a phony soldier, a phony soldier. All Rush did and ever does is shine light on the hypocrisy that is liberalism and the Libs can't stand it. So they do the same thing this questioner is doing - they try to silence them. Where was the outrage when John Murtha absolutely accused our soldiers of atrocities?? He stands by his statement's in that regard today and we are here talking about Rush Limbaugh, a private citizen, making commentary on an actual, factual case of a phony soldier - that is a "soldier" who made false statements about a battle that he never took part in. He then translated his statements into Arabic and released them to the Middle East for propaganda. Then we have Rush Limbaugh out him, and this is the reaction? Sometimes I feel like the world is upside down.

2007-10-04 02:22:47 · answer #5 · answered by MauriceChavez 3 · 1 1

Please congress has used more disparaging comments to demoralize our troops more than one occasion....and continue to do so....Rush is an idiot but I think his comment was made without thinking about how to say those troops that want a withdrawal are uninformed, and have maybe listened to the democrats failure speeches too long.....and to use the time of congress to go after a talk show host is a sign of desperation.

2007-10-04 02:17:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

You need to use spell check and add to the petition; either remove Mr. Limbaugh-the Vietnam war draft dodger-from Armed Forces Radio or provide the troops with equal time programming.

2007-10-05 02:35:53 · answer #7 · answered by marcatine 1 · 0 1

Amendment: Delete it.

From what I've been able to discern from various sources, he never did say anything that would warrant such a response. He actually was talking about soldiers who claimed to serve in Iraq, but in reality did not.

Your question was spawned from a person who took what he said out of context and tried to spin it to incite an anti-rush response. You obviously don't conduct your own research, and are easily manipulated.

2007-10-04 02:11:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 7 1

It sounds to me as though you either want to express your ignorance or you just want to make a case for how public schools are failing their assigned mission: EDUCATION.

Have you heard the concept of free speech? Why don't you petition Columbia University to expel the editor of the campus news paper?

If you don't like what you hear on the radio, change the dial. Stay in school, use spell check and use it often.

2007-10-04 02:17:14 · answer #9 · answered by Barney 6 · 1 1

First, try a spell check.

Second, try getting your facts right. Rush should be suing Congress for slander. He has nothing to apologize nor retract. The "soldiers" he was referring to were, in some cases, misrepresenting their service record, and in other cases, were not even soldiers.

2007-10-04 02:24:14 · answer #10 · answered by kathy_is_a_nurse 7 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers