Clarence Thomas - unsubstantiated CIVIL charge of referring to a pubic hair
Bill Clinton - unsubstantiated CRIMINAL FELONIES of raping Juanita Broaddrick and Molesting Kathleen Wiley.
Libs seem hung up on continuing their "high tech lynching" of Clarence Thomas in the New York Times.
2007-10-04 01:57:59 · 3 answers · asked by Duminos 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
What does it say about Dems when they let a white man "slide" and use a "high tech lynching" on an educated black man?
2007-10-04 02:03:35 · update #1
The liberals convicted Justice Thomas of an unforgivable crime (in their eyes). He is a free thinking Black man, who will not blindly follow everything they say.
2007-10-04 02:25:50 · answer #1 · answered by gerafalop 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In real life, the liberals would try to rehabilitate both and set them loose to do it again. Liberals don't condemn anyone. It is not a persons fault that he is a criminal. It's our fault.
2007-10-04 10:10:23 · answer #2 · answered by John himself 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The stuff with Bill Clinton was just a rediculous witchhunt. Everyone knows that.
2007-10-04 09:39:43 · answer #3 · answered by Villain 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋