English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Is he concerned for the children or for the adverse publicity he would have received for letting Brittany keep the children?

2007-10-04 00:51:22 · 6 answers · asked by divorcecoach 1 in Entertainment & Music Celebrities

6 answers

I think he is genuinely concerned for those kids.In my opinion,he did the right thing.Britney isn't even trying to straighten up or change her ways.I'm not sure that she has the maternal instinct that mothers are supposed to have.I've never seen anyone lose their kids and be all smiles in front of the camera as if nothing ever happened.She just went on with her daily train wreck of a life.She disgusts me so much.

2007-10-04 01:26:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

That judge is brainless..he shld send the kids to their grandparents becos both d parents are problematic!!!!

2007-10-04 09:00:25 · answer #2 · answered by CL T 4 · 0 0

i am so happy that there is finally a judge who is willing to something! so many times judges dont care! good on him! she doesnt deserve them, she has done nothing but put her kids in danger, she is legally their parent, but she is not a mother.

2007-10-04 08:29:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

All I gotta say is that the judge made the right decision.

2007-10-04 08:05:47 · answer #4 · answered by me, myself, and I 7 · 0 0

I think he is concerned about her kids.

2007-10-04 07:54:06 · answer #5 · answered by barbwire 7 · 0 0

i think BOTH.

2007-10-04 07:53:33 · answer #6 · answered by Evaの 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers