When they were talking to a local reverend in New Cross about the sad shooting of an innocent 26 year old woman.
3 MEN and a WOMAN are being questioned over this shooting yet the reporter - I think it was Richard Gaisford, started talking about how we stop the 'kids' who are ruling our streets with their gangs and guns!
It wasn't kids that were responsible, the reverand hadn't mentioned kids so why did Richard Gaisford have to start that?
2007-10-03
23:03:59
·
14 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
News & Events
➔ Media & Journalism
lol meads, never a truer word spoken!
2007-10-03
23:12:32 ·
update #1
morning barbie- i actually didnt see that on gmtv this morni ng- but i agree with you- everything is being blamed on "kids" at the moment- its gone beyond funny now when every child wearing a top with a hood is a hoodie??? maddening- but yes they should have had their facts straight about the shooting - i was watching an irish channel this morning where they said - dodi fayed said in court yesterday.... i wonder how he managed that???? -
2007-10-03 23:13:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by maz 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
i think of she is pushing song prognosis plenty farther than it could go. She is obviously utilising it to sell her very own schedule. i do no longer see, to illustrate, the way you get from the notes in a score to "...the throttling murderous rage of a rapist incapable of achieving launch." Does she know something approximately Beethoven we don't know? and that i do no longer see how any of the which skill she reads into Schubert's song could be expressed via song by myself. that's a a procedures bounce to head from unresolved tonality to a failure to "define identity interior the direction of the consolidation of ego limitations." And a similar loss of tonal determination in Beethoven would not immediately "...precipitate a disaster, thereby justifying the violence mandatory to place issues top returned." it would be purely form of dream-like, as with, say, Debussy. i'm getting it. you think of Beethoven became violent guy, probable a rapist. yet you haven't any longer proved that which incorporate your prognosis, because of the fact song can no longer show that. song is an precis language that does have emotional outcomes on a listener, even though it would not positioned across specific information on the subject of the composer's character and ethical nature. Your interpretations would not, to illustrate, upward thrust up in a courtroom of regulation.
2016-12-28 14:11:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because his a very intelligent person (not), like some people in here who don't even read the question so the answer will be something they think about something else mostly as a critic to the person who made the question.
Have a star, good point about common sense.
2007-10-03 23:17:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by Tim 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Because the intellectual standard of the journalists on this program is about as high as Jodie Marsh`s morals!
Look at Fiona Phillips - how does such a dumb idiot get to be on TV, Oh yes i remember, isn`t her husband on the production team.
2007-10-03 23:13:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by Sir Bobby`s Hairdresser 6
·
5⤊
0⤋
It was GMTV!! No-one with an IQ above 5 works on it, don't stress watch the BBC instead a better quality of programme.
2007-10-03 23:29:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by Elizabeth L 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
Zigg and Zagg on channel 4 were a damn sight better at reporting than GMTV
2007-10-03 23:07:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by Bacon Double Cheese Burger 3
·
4⤊
0⤋
Its simple really, do not watch the program. GMTV is no better than the Sun newspaper on screen.
2007-10-04 01:05:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by James Mack 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
the3y started talking about kids because 9 out of 10 times kids are responswible for unnecessary violence and attacks like this thaats why its programmed into people wqhen things like this happen to blame kids firsat and foremost then look at the bigger picture
2007-10-04 01:47:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by shannonhf05 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Since they altered the age of majority, "kids" of eighteen are now classed as men and women officially whereas any honest law abiding citizen knows only too well that they are still kids, like it or not - why else would they behave like them ! ! !
2007-10-03 23:10:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by minefelloff 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Probably Mr.Gasiford hadn't a clue as to what he was speaking about & so did his own embroidery...
2007-10-03 23:15:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by Faith 6
·
1⤊
0⤋